Expo 2020 is expected to take place between October 2021 and March 2022 and is part of the rotating World’s Expo. However, the European Parliament is calling on the Member States to not participate.

By JERUSALEM POST STAFF, REUTERS
SEPTEMBER 17, 2021

Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, and Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces (Photo credit: Judgment Debtor)

Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and the de facto head of the UAE Federation at an Arab summit in Mecca, Saudi Arabia May 30, 2019. Courtesy of Saudi Royal Court (via Reuters)

Govt Keen On Making New Laws For UAE But Brutally Denied Justice To Victim Who Is A Real Judgment Creditor!

“Statement on the occasion of the 25th Year of Gang-robbery, kidnapping and brutal methods of torture done in captivity by Abu Dhabi Police against an Indian investor, in the light of a gazette notification by Central Government declaring the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as a ‘Reciprocating Territory’, under section 44 A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)”.

Kochi 28 Feb 2020: ‘Reparation Law’ ‘Download the True Story of ‘Govt Keen On Making New Laws For UAE But Brutally Denied Justice To Victim Who Is A Real Judgment Creditor!’, in PDF (Size: 515 Kb)’

Lawsuits brought to redress in UAE courts are twisted by the law enforcement, prosecution and the UAE administration by itself. Police misconduct in UAE involves abuse of power to extort money or in the fabrication of evidence to sway the judicial process. These types of unspeakable crimes are prevalent in the UAE are silently supported by their Indian counterparts, the Union Government.

This reality is aptly exposed in this UAE case featured herein below, as a ‘Marking the 25th Anniversary of Gang-robbery, kidnapping, contempt, etc., by Abu Dhabi Police, in the light of a new legislation of greater importance between the Union of India and the UAE Federation, in line with Section 44 A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).

The Central Government has notified that it recognizes UAE as a reciprocating territory for the purposes of financial recovery from debtors located, or having assets, in India. The courts so designated are called ‘Superior Courts’. This means, the above mentioned legal sanction of India to UAE gives them the freedom to list the names of suspects, who were tried in absentia, and India to chase their defaulters, who have apparently run away from the UAE.

The UAE case is the result of a racially motivated hate crime with assignments of tasks, as part of deliberate design, the law enforcement schemed in collaboration with the Prince Mohammed bin Zayed, the de facto head of Abu Dhabi and the UAE Federation, who was a party to these most serious violations of Human Rights and the Constitutional Rights of a Citizen of India.

The cruelty did not halt there. While the UAE Ruler exercised his fraudulent attitude and ruling deficiency by flouting the 4 consecutive Judgments of UAE Judiciary, the Union of India outwitted the UAE Ruler by dragging the case to date, despite 2 Judicial verdicts from Delhi High Court for securing reliefs.

Here, in this case, a bona fide foreign investor in UAE, the decree-holder of a civil lawsuit, who reported crimes such as trespassing and burglary at his office, was literally kidnapped, tortured, threatened him to be killed and subsequently detained for a long period often in solitary confinement by a group of policemen.

Over 25 years has elapsed since the UAE embezzled the entire assets, real estate properties worth over $100 million of the Investor by fraud, who was an engineering expert, owned and established 3 major companies in General Contracting, Engineering and Trading in Abu Dhabi, UAE, defeating all his relentless fight.

Read the shocking story featured here, the bizarre twist in the case of police extortion in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Shop burgled by Abu Dhabi policemen, US$ 0.4m worth money and valuables looted!

Ever heard of a victim marking the 25th anniversary of the gravest disaster in his life caused by law enforcement authority? It’s the tragic drama of the ‘Judgment Creditor’ in real life.

Regrettably, the discredit goes to the ‘Administration of the UAE, who set ablaze the destruction, by issuing an extremely “Fraudulent Misrepresentation of the Truth” to deport the ‘Judgment Creditor’ from that country, instead of the solemn act of execution of the Judgments passed by the Courts of Law and letting him have the fruits of the Judgments.

A brief background of the story

On behalf of his principal company, the ‘Premier General Contracting Establishment’, the contractor (the Indian Investor herein) had signed a lease-build business contract with an Emirati landlord, ‘Mr. Hassan Saeed’, covering a Nine storied apartment tower.

When a dispute arose with Mr. Hassan Saeed, the Investor, on the basis of legal advice, instituted a civil lawsuit in Abu Dhabi Court for settling the issue.

The Honourable Judge of the Civil lawcourt took a decision in favour of the Investor. Consequently, Hassan Saeed got annoyed and insisted the Investor withdraw the lawsuit unilaterally.

[The following narration is not exhaustive but only a pointer to untold miseries, losses, sufferings; the haunting memories of the ‘cruel and inhuman torture’ and social humiliation suffered by the Indian Investor in UAE].

Scene 1.

On Thursday noon 26th October 1995 Mr. Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Khadir, a policeman in plain clothes from Abu Dhabi police (who haven’t been disclosed his identity), along with Hassan Saeed (the Emirati, accused in the civil case, who has already been warned by the Civil Court against his wrongful motives) came to the private office of the Investor.

The policeman, who held a heavy iron rod of one-meter length and a pair of chained handcuffs. The policeman enquired as to why he filed a lawsuit against him; where’s the original document of the contract? etc., which the Investor refused to disclose.

Scene 2.

As they could not get the required information from the Investor exerting force, they became violent. They wanted to grab and destroy the related documents of the contract from him because an ‘Interim Order’ of the Court already existed against Hassan Saeed.

Towards this the telephone connection was snapped, the entire office was ransacked, drawers opened by force and files were thrown out. The Investor was severely beaten in cold blood and his left-hand fingers were smashed with the iron rod. They paid no heed to the humble requests of the victim.

The policeman forcibly broke open the locker-room with the heavy iron rod in his hand. Thereupon, cash and valuables were found by them.

Scene 3.

So much of money! The policeman’s eyes bulged out in wonder. He looked at his Emirati friend as if he never expected there’s such a large amount of money. The currency blurred their eyes. All in a hurry, both of them grabbed the bunches of currency, and hurriedly stuffed into their pockets. In their hurry and perplexity, part of the currencies spilled over the floor of the cabin.

At this juncture, the younger brother of the Investor arrived at the office with lunch. As he arrived the Investor asked him to close the door and call the police. By then, the policeman in plain clothes managed to get out of the office with the stolen money.

The Emirati too tried to escape from the office, however, with bundled valuables in his hands and pockets full; protruding with the stolen money, he was unable to leave.

Scene 4.

The Policeman in civil dress was standing outside the office and was shouting and striking on the door with the heavy iron rod he held in his hand. By then an inquisitive crowd had gathered around the office of the Investor. The policeman was shouting and warning anyone from coming near to him.

At this point of time, a Police patrol team arrived at the spot. This batch of policemen who came responding to the alert of the Investor immediately hit the Investor and his brother. They were, in fact, allies of the intruders, which the Investor never knew or expected. Their faces had reflections of triumph and cruelty. They were like ferocious animals; both the victims were beaten brutally in cold blood.

Then they handcuffed the Investor and his brother behind their backs and dragged them out of the office, on through the street, and kicked them into the police car.

Scene 5.

The Investor was confined to an underground detention center where he was again brutally tortured. There were four policemen in the torture room, and one shouted “We know how to teach Indians” and asked the Investor to sign some documents. When he refused, a policeman in uniform tried to pull out his injured fingernails with a primitive type of instrument. Due to the heinous form of torture, one of his fingernails was entirely torn apart with the skin surrounding the nail.

It was terrible the excruciating pain by the policemen ripping off his nail from the nail bed. But the real horror was when they forced him to lie down on the floor and took some rag clothes consisting of a long length and rolled it on his head, covering the entire face, and started hitting and kicking. As a result of the harrowing torture methods, he was coughing and gasping for breath for a long time.

Soon thereafter the Investor became unconscious and eventually, he was taken to Central hospital-emergency, Abu Dhabi. Over a dozen X-rays have been taken of the different parts of his body at the hospital and recorded. Treatment was made without removing the shackles and handcuffs.

Scene 6.

When those atrocities were being committed in the detention center, the Investor’s business partner (sponsor), a person belonging to Abu Dhabi met the duty officer of the police station, who is of Captain’s rank. He was then told a concocted story.

That the accused (Investor) had hit three of his police staff and an Emirati, and that one police officer and the Emirati, was in a serious condition and admitted to the hospital and that, they were not permitted to allow him to see the accused.

Scene 7.

The Investor was held in isolated hellholes in different detention centers, often in solitary confinement and traumatized before taking him to the notorious Al Wathba Central Prison.

The Investor was brought to the Federal Court on 27 occasions, dragged with shackles, manacled and cuffed on both hands and legs. The trip was 120 km in an armoured truck to the court and the return therefrom through the desert in harsh weather itself was the worst form of torture. Even when its capacity was 15 persons, about 50 persons were packed like salted fish making each one gasp for breath during the journey.

He was kept waiting all these days in a small and narrow room along with other prisoners without any ventilation or so, but not called up for hearing. It took about six months for the Investor, for listing his case for hearing before a court of law of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Scene 8.

The Court of First Instance expressed its shock while noticing that a victim who sought for police protection from trespassers was arrested and detained!

Eyewitnesses were called to testify in the Court. A Pakistani witness who said that a policeman was holding an iron bar of one-meter length in his hand, threatening anyone who came near the office premises of the accused and was shouting “Indian, Pakistani and Bengalis all are thieves and procurers”.

Another witness who gave a similar statement, added that the Investor has neither resisted the police nor they have beaten anyone and that they are of good nature “I am a Pakistani and they are Indian, no relations are between us, and my testimony is based on truth only. Further, the Court listened to the statement of the 3rd witness who hails from Iran, whose testimony came similar to the declaration of the first two witnesses.

The conduct of the policemen clearly proved the malicious motives of framing criminal complaints against the Investor. It was found that Hassan Saeed was guilty of deception and assault.

A good number of witnesses from different nationalities, who did not care about the threat of the notorious State-police and public prosecution, dared to explain the facts. This was an unusual occurrence in this country and this indeed helped the Court.

Scene 9.

The Judgment of the ‘Legal Court of First Instance’ was pronounced [Case No. 152/1996] on 10-04-1996.

The Investor and his brother, who were charged with offenses by the Abu Dhabi Police, were acquitted. The Court directed the authorities, to prosecute the policemen involved in the illegal activities.

Despite the prevailing political culture, the Legal Court also passed an ‘Investigation Order’ against the heinous crime by Abu Dhabi police and its subsequent cover-ups.

Scene 10.

In a desperate attempt, the prosecution filed an appeal in the APEX Court of Abu Dhabi.

The Supreme Bench, comprising the three-judge panel, granted bail to the Investor on their filing of the appeal. [However, despite the bail and sureties the Investor was not released from the prison].

The eminent Jurists panel was much moved by the massive evidences before them which established beyond doubt, the orchestration of the police and the dishonest deals of the Prosecution. An early trial was therefore ordered.

During the next hearing, the policeman filed a declaration attested by a Notary, where-under he dropped the contentions in his complaint and pleaded guilty. Hassan Saeed followed the suit and admitted his guilt. When the other policemen too pleaded guilty, the competent authority, the Prosecution, has declared itself willing to accept responsibility.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court advised the Investor of his rights to sue against the perpetrators of the crime for damages due to baseless and malicious litigation.

Scene 11.

The final Judgment of the Apex Court was rendered on [No. 188/1996] 19-05-1996. The Hon’ble Court declared that the Investor was absolutely innocent of the charges. The Court observed further that all the pieces of evidence proved propriety in the acts and conduct of the Indian Investor.

The conduct of the Prosecutor was strongly condemned. Referring to the principles of Islamic Law, the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi observed that the law had honoured the man who protected his freedom, his honour, his property, and his soul and that a person dying while protecting that freedom is considered a ‘martyr’.

With regard to the facts of the case, the Supreme Court observed that it was proved in this case, that the policemen and other officials sought to arrest the Investor, without any right and that they curtailed his freedom.

The Court ordered immediate release of the victim, ‘restoration’ of victim’s dignity, respect and reminded about the roles and responsibilities of authority towards the victim for reparation for the losses he suffered while pronouncing a ‘Landmark Judgment’.

(The order of the Court, regrettably enough, was not executed and the culprits were escaped from judicial actions. The Investor and his brother were also not released from prison, in total violation of the order of judicial authority.

Scene 12.

The defiant Executive, however, continued the violation of Human Rights. The UAE Administration committed yet another series of crimes of Contempt of Courts, Fraud, etc., and deported the Judgment Creditor on 28- 09-1996 in the most diabolical manner, without any of his property, dignity or respect whatsoever!

The deportation order was extremely ‘libelous’ – by ‘false statement of facts as if he was punished for a crime’, in defiance of 4 Judicial Verdicts including that of the full bench of the Supreme Court of that country in his full favour!

(The anguish of the Investor resultant from the deprivation of his liberty, dignity, and property, as such his business assets earned solely and exclusively through his untiring personal efforts, causes mental depression which will virtually make his life only a vegetable existence).

Article submitted by Jabir P.K., Founder-CEO, M/s. Overseas Indians Legal Cell (Email to  info@legalcell.com).

Twitter.Com/JabirOrg

WWW.UAE.JABIR.NET

Last updated: 28th Feb, 2020

Reference Links 

• “24th Year of Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration” – Chase the Trails of 24-Year ‘UAE Fugitive’, A Habitual Offender!
• “The Settlement of ‘Non-Execution of Court-Judgments, Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other Offenses in UAE”!
• “Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud”!
• ‘“The Gravest Injustice Towards An Indian Investor In UAE – Open Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Minister for External Affairs, Govt. of India!
• “A Set of UAE Judgments was Unpaid, remained Unexecuted for the last 22 years! Both the Governments, the Government of India and the UAE Federation are Playing with Fire!”
• ‘“Thanks to State Department Cables, a U.S.Torture Victim Won a Rare $10 Million Settlement against UAE ruling family” – The condition: ‘Silence in the Press’!
• ‘Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, is a fugitive from justice. The Government of India has also helped him remain a ‘fugitive debtor’ all these years! ‘A total shame for the so-called India-UAE relations’!
• ‘The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India’
• ‘The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’
• India’s Extradition Treaty With the United Arab Emirates (UAE), The Worst Human Rights Abusers! – ‘A Flashback & The Recognition of Representation-1997′
• UAE Fraud: In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for law-abiding citizens!
• Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

Link To Articles
Legal Instruments & References – The Multi-Billion Dollars Judgment Portfolios of UAE.
‘25th Year of Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration!’
“Open Letters to the UAE Administration
‘Open Letters’

Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.

“24th Year of Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration” - Chase the Trails of 24-Year ‘UAE Fugitive’, A Habitual Offender!

“The Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration” – Marking the 24th Anniversary of Abu Dhabi Police-Looting & Fraud!

‘Statement on the occasion of the 24th Year of Embezzlement of Huge Wealth by Extortion, Gang-Robbery, Kidnapping, Fraud and other Violent Crimes by UAE administration, including prolonged Non-implementation of a set of Judgments of the Legal Courts! – A Gross Miscarriage of Justice Like No Other!

New Delhi 26 Oct, 2018: ‘Reparation Law’ ‘Download the True Story of ‘Chase the Trails of 24-Year ‘UAE Fugitive’, A Habitual Offender!”, in PDF (Size: 455 kb)’

As detailed in the ‘Representation to the Union of India, dated 12-05-2018′, this case is the result of a racially motivated hate crime with assignments of tasks, as part of deliberate design, the local police schemed in collaboration with Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (known as MBZ), Crown Prince and de facto head of the UAE Federation, who was a party to this most serious violations of Human Rights and the Constitutional Rights of a Citizen of India.

There are patent and admitted violation of the precious Constitutional Rights guarantees under Article 14,19,,21 and 300A of the Constitution. The actions and omissions on the part of U.A.E. thus constitute violation of Human Rights for which all countries under the U.N. are liable and answerable.

The Gross Miscarriage of Justice Like None Other the World Has Ever Seen!

The phrase “Miscarriage of Justice” is consistently synonyms with wrongful conviction, referring to a situation in which a person who is actually innocent is convicted of a criminal offense.

Here in this case, a bona fide foreign investor in UAE, the ‘Decree Holder’ of a Civil Lawsuit, who reported crimes such as trespassing and burglary at his office, was kidnapped, tortured, threatened him to be killed and subsequently detained for a long period often in solitary confinement by a group of royal thugs.

He was further treated with all adverse consequences of repeated-victimization, deported him from UAE, that was extremely ‘libelous’ – by ‘false statement of facts as if he was punished for a crime’, in defiance of 4 Judicial Verdicts including that of the full bench of the Supreme Court of that country in his full favour!

The ‘Decree Holder’ was trapped in a fabricated case, but he boldly fought in all the 3 Courts in Abu Dhabi, UAE, against the Abu Dhabi Police, fearless of the negative situations prevailing in that country.

An excerpt of Apex Judgment it reads “All the evidence indicates to the appropriateness of his behaviour”. A full bench of the Supreme Court heard the case and ruled that, there is not a shred of evidence which can prove the accusation. On the contrary there was ample evidence that it was the police who are criminals!

The ‘Decree Holder’ became a winner again, secured 4 consecutive Judgments in UAE against his perpetrators in 1996 but he is still suffering without dignity, respect and all his material wealth due to the fraudulent deportation from UAE by his unscrupulous debtors, the UAE administration!

The Criminal Liability Against UAE Administration

The Criminal Liability for which the person is directly responsible had already been established with a set of Judgments. Any civilized Government, more so a Member of United Nations, should have hastened to implement the Judicial directives.

The execution, the Judicial proceeding will complete only when the ‘Decree Holder’ gets his property or money and compensation for the damages awarded to him as per the Legal Judgments and Orders, apart from a long list of embezzlement of funds and outright fraud.

Had the Court Judgments in favour of the petitioner awarded 24 years ago, i.e., in 1996, been duly executed or granted the appropriate reliefs to the ‘Judgment Creditor’, his case would have been closed then and there. Instead, the UAE administration committed yet another series of crimes of Contempt of Courts, defrauding the Judgment Creditor, fraud etc., and deported the Judgment Creditor in the most diabolical manner!

It’s High Time for the UAE Government to Come Out of its Hideouts, Face the Facts and Uphold the Laws of the Land!

Mohammed bin Zayed, the de facto ruler of UAE, woke up only to ignore 4 numbers of consecutive Court Judgments of his country against him and another Judgment (decree) by default, for guilty of contempt of Courts, perjury, fraud and perverting the course of Justice! [For more details, see 'Open Letter to H.H. Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan', dated 20-04-2018]

The ‘Judgment Creditor’ was an India-born UAE investor in Abu Dhabi, his ‘Business Assets’, including Engineering, Contracting and Trading Firms, stood at a minimum of One Hundred Million U.S. Dollars when the dreadful tragedy took place in the prime of his life.

The Gravest Crime of the UAE Administration which Led to all the Miseries, Irreparable Losses and Sufferings of the Judgment Creditor are Summarized Herein Below, in a Nutshell:

A true story of 24-Years of gross exploitation of huge wealth of a foreign investor in Abu- Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, by offences of Police-extortion, gang-robbery, kidnapping, tortures, fraud etc., apart from contempt of Courts, the prolonged non-implementation of a set of its half-dozen Judgments passed in his favour from both, his host state as well as the sending state.

Mohammed bin Zayed, who is culpable in this most bizarre gruesome crime, had conspired with or rather deployed the Police officials in Abu Dhabi to stop the ‘Execution of a Decree’ awarded to the Petitioner by a Civil Court on an apartment-tower litigation, which was against his associate, an Emirati local.

The policemen did things in the most terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the ‘Decree Holder’, while committing burglary at his office.  A policeman in plain clothes forcibly broke open the office locker with a heavy iron rod in his hand and looted US$.4m worth money and valuables. The Petitioner locked the door and sought intervention from the police. Next to this, the ‘Decree Holder’ had to encounter all the humiliations and the perils in the years that followed. [For more details, see featured article on Abu Dhabi Police-Looting] 

The Petitioner and his younger brother were brutally tortured and abducted from their office by a group of callous policemen who joined hands with the trespassers, and they treated the Petitioner and his brother like ‘terrorists’, beaten in cold blood, kept them isolated in hellholes in different detention centers and traumatized, before taking them to the notorious Al Wathba Central Prison. [For more details, see featured article on ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi, UAE]

They were kept in continuous imprisonment arbitrarily under squalid conditions, often solitary confinement, in order to humiliate or degrade him and was inaccessible by any of his staff or counsels and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

It took six months thereafter, for the petitioner to have his first appearance in Court. A false case was registered against the petitioner under the case No. 152/1996 offenses, alleging “Using force against Government employee and assault”.

Despite all such negative situations, the Petitioner could convince the Judiciary of Abu Dhabi, that the involved policemen were acting upon the instructions of the ruling elite.

The sworn statements procured from witnesses during interrogation, on multiple occasions, were misplaced and or rejected by the Police-Prosecution Mafia operating in that country.

Even Indian witnesses were threatened by prosecutors against testifying the facts. It triggered the witnesses from other nationalities coming forward to give testimonial evidences in Open Courts despite warnings of dire consequences.

The Criminal Court expressed its shock while noticing that a victim who sought for police help from trespassers was deliberately beaten and detained!

The Hon. Court anxiously listened to the evidences of eyewitnesses from different nationalities. Mr. Saleem Raza, a Pakistani who said a policeman was holding an iron bar of one meter length in his hand, threatening anyone who came near the office premises of the accused and was shouting “Indian, Pakistani and Bengali all are thieves and procurers”.

Mr. Zulfiqar Ali who gave similar statement, moreover he added-that the ‘accused’ have neither resisted the police nor they have beaten anyone from the patrolling squad and that the ‘accused’ are of good nature “I am a Pakistani and they are Indian, no relations are between us, and my testimony is based on truth only.

Further the Court listened to the statement of the 3rd witness Mr. Shirban Kalobar, an Iranian, whose testimony came similar to the declaration of the first two witnesses.

The Hon. Criminal Court found the offenders (3 Policemen and the associate of bin Zayed) were guilty and has issued an investigation order towards the crime committed by them.

During the course of hearing, the policemen dropped all charges framed against the ‘accused’, by separate written statements duly attested by Notary Public, pleaded guilty of their illegal actions which amounted to a conspiracy against the petitioner.

When the Policemen and the Emirati, the associate of bin Zayed,  pleaded guilty, the competent authority, the Prosecution, has declared itself willingness to accept responsibility, in order to avoid further investigation in the case.

Despite the prevailing political culture, the Legal Court passed the ‘Investigation Order’ against the heinous police-crime and the subsequent cover-ups. (The authentic Judgement by ‘CRIMINAL COURT’ is available here both, Arabic and its English Translation)

In a desperate attempt, the prosecution moved the Apex Court.  Subsequently, the Full Bench of the Highest Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE, heard the case at length considered the facts and evidence and affirmed the Judgement of the Lower court and approved the investigation order against the culprits, the Policemen and bin Zayed associate. The conduct of the Prosecutor too was condemned.

The Hon. Appellate Full-Court therefore, while pronouncing its Judgment, ordered the restoration of the victim’s dignity, rights and privileges, and to compensate him for all his losses. (The authentic Judgement by the ‘APEX COURT OF ABU DHABI’ is available here both, Arabic and its English Translation)

All the Four Judicial Verdicts of Abu Dhabi Courts were Nakedly Violated by the ‘UAE Administration’ and the De Facto Ruler Refused to Obey and Implement the Court Orders. 

As the case history reveals that with the malicious motive of destroying the petitioner, the repeated orders of the Courts to release the Petitioner and to investigate the conduct of the Police, vis-a-vis the crimes committed by police, the reparation order etc, were defied by the UAE executive, causing extreme hardships to the ‘Judgment Creditor’. This superstition of  Judicial decisions by executive fiat is rank subversion of the rule of law.

The UAE Authority fraudulently twisted the due administration of justice in order to evade the law and avoid its punishment against the perpetrators. The specific order passed by the UAE Judiciary to investigate offences of policemen against the Petitioner such as extortion, gang-robbery, and about the involvement of senior officials in the scheme and other heinous crimes, tortures etc., was never probed in spite of clear evidences. [For more details on Abu Dhabi Police-Torture, see 'The Authentic Reply towards the Letter No.G/3139/2013/MEA (Gulf Division) dated 10-10-2013]

During the course of hearing, the policemen also pleaded guilty of their illegal actions which amounted to a conspiracy against the petitioner. What was left thereafter was ‘only the Execution of Court Judgments to give the sanctioned benefits of those Judgments to the Petitioner. But instead, the Administration of UAE, deported the ‘Petitioner’ to India violated each and every verdicts of the Judiciary of the UAE and committed the serious crime of Contempt of Court.

Worst still, the debtor, the ‘UAE administration’, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, thus to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, his personal images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat, his intellectual property including his valuable expertise in profession. (The authentic Order of [FRAUDULENT] DEPORTATION by UAE Administration’ is available here in Arabic, and here its English Translation)

Ultimately, this fraudulent order of deportation also led to the Petitioner’s character assassination, who had an investor-status in UAE with a group of well established business institutions in the country, worth millions of investments, leaving him in utter penury and physical trauma.

The High Court of Delhi

The ‘legal fight’ for the enforcement of Judgments’ took in very many proceedings before the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi. The Delhi High Court heard the Petitioner’s Writ Petition in 1997 and issued a ‘Mandamus’ to the Union of India, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), to settle the case in ‘Two Months’ with the UAE counterpart. (The authentic Judgement of HIGHT COURT OF DELHI, Appellate Civil Jurisdiction).

The Union of India is Doing an Unpardonable Mistake of Dragging the Case for a Long Period of 24 Years to Date, Despite a Portfolio of Six Legal Judgments, Apart from ‘Contempt of Courts’ and Unlawful Tactics.

In a letter dated 29-04-2018 the Union of India asked the Petitioner as to what action shall be taken to resolve the case! [A copy of letter dated 29-04-2018 the Union of India, is available here in PDF format].

In response thereto, a detailed reply was sent by the Petitioner to the Union Government, about the action to be taken on the basis of criminal contempt and disregard for the laws, rules and orders against the most serious and heinous of crimes by UAE administration, covering all the relevant facts. [For more details, see 'The Authentic Reply to the Union of India, dated 12-05-2018]

The Union government will have to take up the case, at least at this belated stage, by way of parley and negotiations consistent with procedural codes of international laws and conventions. The UAE must be persuaded (or even pressurized) to accept the just claims of the Petitioner for a time bound enforcement of the Judgments, recover embezzled funds and payment of damages for the continued violations of the Human Rights of the petitioner.

If a grossly unjust and illegal stand is persisted in by UAE, and contumaciously too, UAE has to be held further liable for such perpetration of atrocities and gross violation of Human Rights. This can be done effectively, by proceeding against the massive assets and investments made by UAE in the various ventures in India proposed on a collaboration basis (by way of industries and other commercial transactions).

The UAE has adopted a reasonable attitude when it settled the American citizens claims for damages for violation of Human Rights against Abu Dhabi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Zayed, when, the American Court issued process overruling the technical contentions of their diction.

The Order of the Court in the U.S. and the settlement reached between UAE and the complainant therein (Details produced herewith) will buttress the just demands of the Indian National, which Union of India has the honour and privilege to represent.

In the above circumstances, it is respectfully submitted that if the Government of India persuade and pressurize the UAE to meet its obligations under the laws, particularly the ‘International Laws‘. It will obviate a litigation against UAE and generate goodwill in the minds of the Indian citizens, particularly those undertaking enterprises involving substantial investments.

The injustices and cruelties of the authorities of UAE, against the Petitioner, has now crossed an unimaginably long life of ‘Twenty Four’ years! These events have, in turn, destroyed all the potential life span of the Petitioner and there’s no amount of money will ever compensate him for the loss he have suffered!

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir (Petitioner)
Friday 26 Oct, 2018.

Twitter.Com/JabirOrg

WWW.UAE.JABIR.NET

Some of the Representations by the ‘Whistle-blower’ that Speaks For Itself!

1) Probably, the First Hate-Crime Charge Filed Against U.A.E. Regime in the History of OHCHR Geneva, Dated 26-12-1996.

Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi, where systematic torture and other forms of unethical and inhuman treatments on prisoners, especially against Indians taken place on a regular basis.

The Union of India has never discharged its duties and has always remained silent against such atrocities surrounded on Indian prisoners in UAE.

The Petitioner took up his case, along with the pleas and sufferings of Thousands of prisoners to the United Nations and others who’re concerned about Human Rights violations worldwide. [Full Text: The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’]

2) ‘Union of India Cannot Extradite its Own Nationals to the U.A.E.!’ – A Representation Towards Extradition Treaty Between India and the UAE, Dated 24-11-1997.

A copy of representation, on the proposed India-UAE Extradition Treaty, was handed over to the then President of India, Shri K.R.Narayanan, by the ‘Petitioner’.

The Hon’ble President of India was kind enough to use his discretionary powers and transferred the same to the ‘top bureaucrats’ in South Block, Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. Both, India and the UAE had ultimately signed the treaty but Union of India cannot extradite its own nationals to the country in question under this treaty which came into force in 2000.

This particular clause applied to the ‘Extradition Treaty’ that a state does not have any obligation to surrender its own citizen, not only helped a majority of Indian migrants of UAE from false accusations and warrants but also relieved the Indian Courts from wasting precious time. [Full Text: India-UAE Extradition Treaty, A Flashback & The Recognitions of A Representation-1997]

3) Strategy Formulation and Implementation of ‘Reparation Mechanisms’ Between India and the GCC countries, Dated 25-01-2013

‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ – Strategy Formulation and Implementation of a Mutual Human Rights Law and Reparation Mechanisms Between the Government of India and the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries, mandating our elected representatives and officials to eliminate discrimination and imbalances of Non-resident Indians (NRIs) working in different countries. This also involves the recognition and protection of the dignity and respect of individuals. [Read: Summary of Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms]

VISIT TIMELINE: INDO-GULF REPARATION MECHANISMS

GLOBAL CAMPAIGN!

‘Judgment For Sale’ (Court Judgments are not worthless piece of papers) As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the ‘Decree Holder’ has the right to offer his Judgment for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity. …Why do we sell the UAE Judgments?

Global Campaign
“Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks”

Reference Links 

• “The Settlement of ‘Non-Execution of Court-Judgments, Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other Offenses in UAE”!
• “Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud”!
• ‘“The Gravest Injustice Towards An Indian Investor In UAE – Open Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Minister for External Affairs, Govt. of India!
• “A Set of UAE Judgments was Unpaid, remained Unexecuted for the last 22 years! Both the Governments, the Government of India and the UAE Federation are Playing with Fire!”
• ‘“Thanks to State Department Cables, a U.S.Torture Victim Won a Rare $10 Million Settlement against UAE ruling family” – The condition: ‘Silence in the Press’!
• ‘Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, is a fugitive from justice. The Government of India has also helped him remain a ‘fugitive debtor’ all these years! ‘A total shame for the so-called India-UAE relations’!
• ‘The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India’
• ‘The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’
• India’s Extradition Treaty With United Arab Emirates (UAE), The Worst Human Rights Abusers! – ‘A Flashback & The Recognition of Representation-1997′
• UAE Fraud: In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for the law abiding citizens!
• Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

Link To Articles

Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud

20th April, 2018 New Delhi.

‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH ABDULLAH BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET OF JUDGMENTS OF UAE COURTS & OUTRIGHT FRAUD’

Download the Authentic  Open Letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud, in PDF (Size: 530 kb)

From
Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],
M/S. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, 501, Metro Plaza Building,
Market Road, Near High Court, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018.

To
H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan,
UAE Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, United Arab Emirates.

Sub. “Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts &
Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration”

His Highness,

This ‘Open Letter’ is a reminder of the previous letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India, Dated 28th Feb, 2018. Full text.

The Petitioner is forwarding herewith a copy of his latest representation to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, dated 09th Feb-2018 for redressal of sufferings and deprivation of all his Rights and assets consequent on his fraudulent and inhuman deportation from the UAE in the year 1996 over-riding the fact that 4 successive Judgments in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts, finding the UAE officials guilty of the most heinous crimes against him.

The petitioner was closely associated with the Private Departments of (Late) H,H.Shaikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, from 1982 onwards, the then Emir of Abu Dhabi and also the President of United Arab Emirates, H.H. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who succeeded Sheikh Zayed as ruler and many others in the ruling family. He had registrations with all the major Oil & Gas Companies on behalf of his firms General Contracting & Trading Est., with all mandatory Governmental Licences, for bidding/tendering/projects/participations etc., and contributed much to the developments of Abu Dhabi Emirate. The petitioner was one of the first India-born real estate investors in Abu Dhabi, UAE, which is a multi-trillion US dollar industry today.

This is a case of personal and racially aggravated attack with malicious motives by ‘higher officials of Abu Dhabi’, UAE, in collaboration with Police, to stop an ‘execution of a Decree’ awarded by the Civil Court on an Apartment Tower  contract  in 1995,  which involves extortion, trespassing, inhuman torture, illegal detention,  criminal conspiracy and fraud against an Indian investor.

[The following part was a significant turning point in this case, it also exposes the deplorable state of affairs in the Administration of Abu Dhabi Police, during the period of the petitioner’s case; in the year 1995].

“In the instant case, the Abu Dhabi policemen did their atrocious acts towards the petitioner in a terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the Petitioner while committing burglary at his office. Thereby they already lost their face.

The policemen who came responding to the alert of the Petitioner, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the  law breakers and jointly attacked the petitioner so horribly, worse than death, at the instance of the local Emirati  (the friend of ‘Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan’) for getting illegal gains and to circumvent the Court’s order in force against him. The Petitioner and his younger brother were literally kidnapped from their office by the policemen and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

The Criminal Court found the offenders (A group of policemen and the local Emirati) were guilty and, therefore, passed orders to investigate the crime committed by them. Then followed several other Court Judgments and orders in absolute in favour of the petitioner including the highest Court of Abu Dhabi, against the culprits”.

An excerpt from the Apex Court Judgment reads as follows:-

“Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom….” (Apex Court Judgment, 188/1996 dated 19/5/1996 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates).

The enforcement of a Judgment is regarded as an integral part of the fundamental Human Right to a fair trial in a reasonable time. That has been violated. Worst still, the Judgment-debtor, the UAE ruler, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat and valuable expertise in profession.

After arriving India in 1996, the petitioner had submitted very many representations to your Excellency, as a respondent in the case, detailing his inordinate sufferings due to the patent violations of Human Rights perpetrated against him by your country. Two Judicial Orders were also passed by the High Court of Delhi to you (after approaching the Supreme Court) to settle the case.  A period of twenty two years is passed by till date, but there was no response/acknowledgement was received to any of them.

The Petitioner is yet to receive any relief from the country you are privileged to represent in India.  In recent times, the scenario  in legal area has changed entirely.  That a citizen of any country can seek relief from another country (including UAE) has been established, and also acquiesced in by UAE.

The issue of summons to the UAE Ambassador in America, in a Civil Suit instituted in 2009 in a U.S. District Court against UAE (against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family, who were accused of roles in the abduction and torture) has led to this important development.  Though the charges and jurisdiction of American Court were questioned initially by UAE, it was conceded as evidenced by settlement reached in between the U.S. citizen and UAE.  It is, therefore, open to Indian Courts or authorities to give relief to a person in India, to sue your Government as well in the light of the legal development.

In the present case, UAE Government has additionally made investments in various parts of India.  Your Government is also engaging in trading and commercial activities worth billions of US dollars.  UAE owns properties in the State of Kerala as well.

Before instituting a Suit against you and your country in the light of subsequent development, the Petitioner felt, and he was advised by the Legal Cell of the Indian Society of Authors (with a former Judge of Kerala High Court as Chairman), and members like Judges of the Mumbai and Kerala High Courts and other Government Lawyers that,  it would be desirable to appraise you about his intention to file a Suit in Kerala for securing relief overdue.

The Petitioner would certainly like to avoid a legal battle, wasteful and long drawn out. This letter is to request you humbly, to compensate him for the damages he has sustained under the various counts including violation and deprivation of the Human Rights, and torture and for the deprivation of all his businesses, assets and earnings situated in UAE at the time of his illegal deportation.  The compensation due to him, would be very substantial, aggregating to very many millions of US Dollars. The Petitioner would be only happy in the circumstances, if you could settle his claim, or agree for a settlement by known legal methods including Arbitration as regards quantum of compensation;  Arbitration by a mutually agreed authority.  He would prefer the direct settlement between the parties.

The UAE is liable to pay the petitioner for all the natural and direct consequences of its wrongful act. Apart from actual loss and exemplary or punitive damages, he is entitled to get compensatory damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, aggravated damages for pain and sufferings, violation of his dignity, respect and rights,  as detailed in the representation filed before the Government of India, towards the price of his business assets, real estate investments left behind in the UAE when he was illegally deported; and the business profits and gains and its market value he would have earned, as well as other expenses for all these years that followed.

There was not merely criminal failure on the part of the authorities in the implementation of a set of Judgements of the Court of Law (in the case relating to aggravated assault, burglary etc.) The authorities are also liable to compensate the petitioner for his intangible injuries as damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as result of the unjust and illegal actions of the authorities, continued up to the deportation and resultant deprivation when he landed in his home land, bereft of any assets whatever.

The (irremediable) damages inflicted on Petitioner by UAE authorities and its far-reaching repercussions:-

Mental distress (by aggravated assault, abduction, detention, extortion, and inhuman torture);

Anguish (resulting from the impact of torture, and deprivation of businesses, investments, company staffs and employees and mental peace of the members of his family and relatives);

Grief (about the state of affairs of himself and the members of his family);

Anxiety (about his own health, ailments, and worries about his staffs, employees and his family) He had to suffer pancreas disorders, heart ailments, compelling him to be an inpatient in hospitals, and continuing to suffer such ailments requiring constant and massive medication;

Vexation (including that caused by the feelings of agony to himself and the members of his family);

Indignation (against the inhumanities of the administration);

Outrage (about the total lack of Rule of Law, and the feeling that even the judiciary is treated with contempt);

Wounded Pride (in the background of the loss of high esteem and dignity he enjoyed in UAE and his homeland India);

Loss of Faith (regarding the petitioner in friends and colleagues and the like. Such persons included businessmen attached to very prestigious investing establishments).

The petitioner  is entitled to compensation for this unique case of  repeated defrauding of the ‘Judgement Creditor’, torturing him to near death, and violating ‘Four Judgements of the UAE Courts’ in his favour and the like. Having regard to the serious nature of the loss and injuries suffered and continuing to be suffered, he is also entitled to an interim relief, on urgent basis, fixed at 120 million US Dollars [INR.782 crore].

The Petitioner seeks an expeditious remedy, in view of the sufferings undergone by him for a long duration of nearly twenty-two years.  As a founder member of ‘INSA’, (Indian Society of Authors, Kerala Chapter), the Petitioner have already requested ‘INSA’ to offer him assistance through their Legal Cell, and he expect that, the organization and its Legal Cell (with very many former Judges of the High Courts and Subordinate Courts and Senior Lawyers) to help him in the just and equitable cause.

The Petitioner expects a  response and reply before 14th May, 2018.  If there is no response, he will be constrained to resort to legal proceedings, holding you and your country responsible for all the costs and consequences thereof.

Yours faithfully,

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],

Encl:
Ref. Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Hon’ble Minister for External Affairs, dated 09-02-2018.

Open Letter [Main] to:
H.E Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration’

Open Letter [Copies] to:
1) H.H Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, The President of UAE & Ruler of Abu Dhabi.
2) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai.
3) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.
4) H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of UAE and International Cooperation.
5) H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister of UAE and Minister of the Interior.
6) H.E Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Last Update: 20th April, 2018, New Delhi.

Return to the Legal Cell’s Founder CEO

Visit Case Exhibits: UAE.JABIR.NET

MISSION STATEMENT

Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.

CASE LAW   |   RESOURCES   |  SOCIAL MEDIA   |   PUBLICATIONS   |   NEWS ROOM

]]> https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-abdullah-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-minister-of-foreign-affairs-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/feed/ 0 https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-uae-ambassador-to-india-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-and-outright-fraud/ https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-uae-ambassador-to-india-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-and-outright-fraud/#comments Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:48:29 +0000 admin http://www.reparationlaw.com/news/?p=1163 Read more »]]>

‘Open Letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration’

20th April, 2018 New Delhi.

‘OPEN LETTER TO H.E. DR. AHMED AL BANNA, THE UAE AMBASSADOR TO INDIA, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET OF JUDGMENTS OF UAE COURTS & OUTRIGHT FRAUD BY THE UAE ADMINISTRATION’

Download the Authentic  Open Letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud, in PDF (Size: 530 kb)

From
Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],
M/S. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, 501, Metro Plaza Building,
Market Road, Near High Court, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018.

To
H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India,
12, Chandragupta Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi – 110 021.

Sub. “Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts &
Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration”

His Excellency,

This ‘Open Letter’ is a reminder of the previous letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India, Dated 28th Feb, 2018. Full text.

The Petitioner is forwarding herewith a copy of his latest representation to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, dated 09th Feb-2018 for redressal of sufferings and deprivation of all his Rights and assets consequent on his fraudulent and inhuman deportation from the UAE in the year 1996 over-riding the fact that 4 successive Judgments in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts, finding the UAE officials guilty of the most heinous crimes against him.

The petitioner was closely associated with the Private Departments of (Late) H,H.Shaikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, from 1982 onwards, the then Emir of Abu Dhabi and also the President of United Arab Emirates, H.H. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who succeeded Sheikh Zayed as ruler and many others in the ruling family. He had registrations with all the major Oil & Gas Companies on behalf of his firms General Contracting & Trading Est., with all mandatory Governmental Licences, for bidding/tendering/projects/participations etc., and contributed much to the developments of Abu Dhabi Emirate. The petitioner was one of the first India-born real estate investors in Abu Dhabi, UAE, which is a multi-trillion US dollar industry today.

This is a case of personal and racially aggravated attack with malicious motives by ‘higher officials of Abu Dhabi’, UAE, in collaboration with Police, to stop an ‘execution of a Decree’ awarded by the Civil Court on an Apartment Tower  contract  in 1995,  which involves extortion, trespassing, inhuman torture, illegal detention,  criminal conspiracy and fraud against an Indian investor.

[The following part was a significant turning point in this case, it also exposes the deplorable state of affairs in the Administration of Abu Dhabi Police, during the period of the petitioner’s case; in the year 1995].

“In the instant case, the Abu Dhabi policemen did their atrocious acts towards the petitioner in a terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the Petitioner while committing burglary at his office. Thereby they already lost their face.

The policemen who came responding to the alert of the Petitioner, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the  law breakers and jointly attacked the petitioner so horribly, worse than death, at the instance of the local Emirati  (the friend of ‘Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan’) for getting illegal gains and to circumvent the Court’s order in force against him. The Petitioner and his younger brother were literally kidnapped from their office by the policemen and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

The Criminal Court found the offenders (A group of policemen and the local Emirati) were guilty and, therefore, passed orders to investigate the crime committed by them. Then followed several other Court Judgments and orders in absolute in favour of the petitioner including the highest Court of Abu Dhabi, against the culprits”.

An excerpt from the Apex Court Judgment reads as follows:-

“Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom….” (Apex Court Judgment, 188/1996 dated 19/5/1996 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates).

The enforcement of a Judgment is regarded as an integral part of the fundamental Human Right to a fair trial in a reasonable time. That has been violated. Worst still, the Judgment-debtor, the UAE ruler, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat and valuable expertise in profession.

After arriving India in 1996, the petitioner had submitted very many representations to your Excellency, as a respondent in the case, detailing his inordinate sufferings due to the patent violations of Human Rights perpetrated against him by your country. Two Judicial Orders were also passed by the High Court of Delhi to you (after approaching the Supreme Court) to settle the case.  A period of twenty two years is passed by till date, but there was no response/acknowledgement was received to any of them.

The Petitioner is yet to receive any relief from the country you are privileged to represent in India.  In recent times, the scenario  in legal area has changed entirely.  That a citizen of any country can seek relief from another country (including UAE) has been established, and also acquiesced in by UAE.

The issue of summons to the UAE Ambassador in America, in a Civil Suit instituted in 2009 in a U.S. District Court against UAE (against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family, who were accused of roles in the abduction and torture) has led to this important development.  Though the charges and jurisdiction of American Court were questioned initially by UAE, it was conceded as evidenced by settlement reached in between the U.S. citizen and UAE.  It is, therefore, open to Indian Courts or authorities to give relief to a person in India, to sue your Government as well in the light of the legal development.

In the present case, UAE Government has additionally made investments in various parts of India.  Your Government is also engaging in trading and commercial activities worth billions of US dollars.  UAE owns properties in the State of Kerala as well.

Before instituting a Suit against you and your country in the light of subsequent development, the Petitioner felt, and he was advised by the Legal Cell of the Indian Society of Authors (with a former Judge of Kerala High Court as Chairman), and members like Judges of the Mumbai and Kerala High Courts and other Government Lawyers that,  it would be desirable to appraise you about his intention to file a Suit in Kerala for securing relief overdue.

The Petitioner would certainly like to avoid a legal battle, wasteful and long drawn out. This letter is to request you humbly, to compensate him for the damages he has sustained under the various counts including violation and deprivation of the Human Rights, and torture and for the deprivation of all his businesses, assets and earnings situated in UAE at the time of his illegal deportation.  The compensation due to him, would be very substantial, aggregating to very many millions of US Dollars. The Petitioner would be only happy in the circumstances, if you could settle his claim, or agree for a settlement by known legal methods including Arbitration as regards quantum of compensation;  Arbitration by a mutually agreed authority.  He would prefer the direct settlement between the parties.

The UAE is liable to pay the petitioner for all the natural and direct consequences of its wrongful act. Apart from actual loss and exemplary or punitive damages, he is entitled to get compensatory damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, aggravated damages for pain and sufferings, violation of his dignity, respect and rights,  as detailed in the representation filed before the Government of India, towards the price of his business assets, real estate investments left behind in the UAE when he was illegally deported; and the business profits and gains and its market value he would have earned, as well as other expenses for all these years that followed.

There was not merely criminal failure on the part of the authorities in the implementation of a set of Judgements of the Court of Law (in the case relating to aggravated assault, burglary etc.) The authorities are also liable to compensate the petitioner for his intangible injuries as damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as result of the unjust and illegal actions of the authorities, continued up to the deportation and resultant deprivation when he landed in his home land, bereft of any assets whatever.

The (irremediable) damages inflicted on Petitioner by UAE authorities and its far-reaching repercussions:-

Mental distress (by aggravated assault, abduction, detention, extortion, and inhuman torture);

Anguish (resulting from the impact of torture, and deprivation of businesses, investments, company staffs and employees and mental peace of the members of his family and relatives);

Grief (about the state of affairs of himself and the members of his family);

Anxiety (about his own health, ailments, and worries about his staffs, employees and his family) He had to suffer pancreas disorders, heart ailments, compelling him to be an inpatient in hospitals, and continuing to suffer such ailments requiring constant and massive medication;

Vexation (including that caused by the feelings of agony to himself and the members of his family);

Indignation (against the inhumanities of the administration);

Outrage (about the total lack of Rule of Law, and the feeling that even the judiciary is treated with contempt);

Wounded Pride (in the background of the loss of high esteem and dignity he enjoyed in UAE and his homeland India);

Loss of Faith (regarding the petitioner in friends and colleagues and the like. Such persons included businessmen attached to very prestigious investing establishments).

The petitioner  is entitled to compensation for this unique case of  repeated defrauding of the ‘Judgement Creditor’, torturing him to near death, and violating ‘Four Judgements of the UAE Courts’ in his favour and the like. Having regard to the serious nature of the loss and injuries suffered and continuing to be suffered, he is also entitled to an interim relief, on urgent basis, fixed at 120 million US Dollars [INR.782 crore].

The Petitioner seeks an expeditious remedy, in view of the sufferings undergone by him for a long duration of nearly twenty-two years.  As a founder member of ‘INSA’, (Indian Society of Authors, Kerala Chapter), the Petitioner have already requested ‘INSA’ to offer him assistance through their Legal Cell, and he expect that, the organization and its Legal Cell (with very many former Judges of the High Courts and Subordinate Courts and Senior Lawyers) to help him in the just and equitable cause.

The Petitioner expects a  response and reply before 14th May, 2018.  If there is no response, he will be constrained to resort to legal proceedings, holding you and your country responsible for all the costs and consequences thereof.

Yours faithfully,

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],

Encl:
Ref. Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Hon’ble Minister for External Affairs, dated 09-02-2018.

Open Letter [Main] to:
H.E Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration’

Open Letter [Copies] to:
1) H.H Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, The President of UAE & Ruler of Abu Dhabi.
2) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai.
3) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.
4) H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of UAE and International Cooperation.
5) H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister of UAE and Minister of the Interior.
6) H.E Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Last Update: 20th April, 2018, New Delhi.

Return to the Legal Cell’s Founder CEO

Visit Case Exhibits: UAE.JABIR.NET

MISSION STATEMENT

Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.

CASE LAW   |   RESOURCES   |   PUBLICATIONS   |  SOCIAL MEDIA   |   NEWS ROOM

]]> https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-uae-ambassador-to-india-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-and-outright-fraud/feed/ 0 https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/a-set-of-uae-judgments-were-unpaid-remained-unexecuted-for-the-last-22-years-both-the-governments-the-government-of-india-and-the-uae-federation-are-playing-with-fire/ https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/a-set-of-uae-judgments-were-unpaid-remained-unexecuted-for-the-last-22-years-both-the-governments-the-government-of-india-and-the-uae-federation-are-playing-with-fire/#comments Thu, 03 Aug 2017 18:32:38 +0000 admin http://www.reparationlaw.com/news/?p=1135 Read more »]]>

‘Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, visits Trump in Washington on May 15, 2017 ahead of US president’s trip to Saudi Arabia’

“A SET OF UAE JUDGMENTS WAS UNPAID, REMAINED UNEXECUTED FOR THE LAST 22 YEARS! – BOTH THE GOVERNMENTS, THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND THE U.A.E FEDERATION ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE!”
04 August,2017 New Delhi.  ['Reparation Law, News]

“A SET OF UAE JUDGMENTS WAS UNPAID, REMAINED UNEXECUTED FOR THE LAST 22 YEARS! – BOTH THE GOVERNMENTS, THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND THE U.A.E FEDERATION ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE!”

“UAE paid $10m to settle the U.S. Torture case of its citizen while he was in UAE way back in 1984. The most genuine case of an Indian Investor and Trader in Abu Dhabi, UAE, in 1995, the most heinous and multifarious crimes perpetrated by ‘the de facto head of the UAE Federation, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, on UAE soil, stands unsettled even after twenty two years ridiculing the ‘Judgment Creditor’ of the case, and casting shame on both India and UAE”

We should all be ashamed of the government of India’s rotten and unprincipled diplomacy, in spite of the passing of 4 consecutive Judgments from the UAE Courts, including the ‘Landmark Judgment’ from Apex Court of Abu Dhabi in absolute, in favour of an India-born, Abu Dhabi-based investor and trader, as well as two other judgments from the High Court of Delhi, which was moved after approaching the Hon. Supreme Court of India, against the de facto head of the UAE, the Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who perpetrated, masterminded, and triggered many different kinds of violent crimes against an Indian investor in UAE, including fraud, torture and looting, in order to withdraw a civil lawsuit against his associate, on a building tower contract in 1995.

It is inconceivable that when anti-social elements hatch a conspiracy and attempt virtual destruction of a continued life, the violators of law in the State are protected by the United Arab Emirates. The situation cannot be allowed to pass unnoticed by a responsible and civilized Governments in India, when the facts and files establish such wanton violations of Human Rights against a citizen.

‘The US Authority was keen and honest to take up the case of its citizen with the UAE government and the claim was settled just in 3 years’.  On the other hand, the Government of India did an unpardonable mistake of dragging the most legitimate case of an Indian investor and trader in UAE for a long period of 22 years as of now, despite a portfolio of six legal judgments from different Courts in his favour.

‘It would appear that, the big heads in the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, is hand in glove with the criminal nexus in the UAE. Why should the Indian authorities stand in the way and resist an Indian citizen seeking redress and enforcement of a set of foreign judgments in Indian Courts?

The transformation of a U.S. Human Rights Lawsuit against Abu Dhabi’s Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan to a $10 million settlement is a living example of successful foreign relations among responsible States who value the dignity of its citizens’. Honestly, the Government of India should awake and act now or the next generation will feel ashamed of being born in India!

‘KHALED AL HASSEN V. SHEIKH KHALIFA BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN’
[District Court, California, United States]

Nearly three decades after the UAE bought the silence of Khaled al-Hassen, a naturalized U.S. citizen, who was allegedly tortured by Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, crown prince of Abu Dhabi, during the 1980s, according to documents leaked from the hacked email account of Yousef al-Otaiba, the Emirati ambassador to the US, obtained media outlets.

Khaled Hassen secured a $10 million settlement in 2013 roughly 3 years after filing the lawsuit in a U.S. District Court, against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family. As a condition of his settlement, Hassen is not allowed to speak about the case.

Khalid Hassan’s case against three senior members of the UAE ruling family, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, UAE President Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan and retired Brigadier General Saeed Hilal Al-Darmaki, was brought in 2009  before the Federal Court in Los Angeles when Hassan’s lawyers cited the State Department’s telegrams as an evidence of his detention in the UAE, which were published in 2006, that highlight attempts by the US embassy to locate and secure his release.

Khaled Hassen alleged that he was abducted, taken to a secret location, tortured and forced to sign a false confession while working in the United Arab Emirates. The lawsuit seeking civil monetary damages from three members of the royal family in Abu Dhabi, including the Emir, a key U.S. ally in the Middle East.”

After initially denying the charges, the UAE admitted that Hassan was being held by a state security agency under high level government supervision. The attorneys for defendants argued that, litigating plaintiff’s claim in California District would be inefficient and unfair for defendants, who reside in the UAE and hold extremely high governmental positions which require their presence and attention. Therefore, Plaintiff’s claims should be dismissed.

While the judge Dolly Gee, Central District court, warned that the lawsuit may be rejected because the defendants were in the UAE, lawyers argued that the ambassador of the United Arab Emirates was in the US and the judge to accept the case.

Although U.S. Courts normally only hear trials in cases where due process has been exhausted in the country where the crimes were committed, Hassan argued that judiciary in the UAE is run and governed by the same people who tortured him and therefore the trial would not be independent.

During the case the Emirati ambassador to the US was worked behind the scenes to protect members of the ruling family. The president’s name was removed from the case for diplomatic reasons. However, the trial judge would not accept the argument of diplomatic immunity for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and General Saeed al-Darmaki.

By May 2013, a $10 million reparation package had been signed secretly for the closure of the case and for details of it not to be made public.  … Read full text ‘Khaled Hassen v. Sheikh Khalifa’

INVEST IN #UAE JUDGMENTS – Earn FIVE TIMES Value Without Losing Your MONEY! https://t.co/QrNuTcgC7W#AJEnglish #Doha #Qatar #AbuDhabi #IDPO pic.twitter.com/o9dckZSFNn

— GCC Crowdfunding (@GCCCrowdfunding) August 3, 2017

‘‘P.K. JABIR V. SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN’ 

The points raised by the U.S. attorneys for defendants in the torture case, United States, stood a powerful deterrent against his ‘defendants’ in UAE whereas the Indian investor had taken up his case soon after he was attacked, looted and kidnaped, further arbitrarily detained for over a year in different torture chambers in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

All his claims were proved in the legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Hon. Court has  issued investigation orders against the conspirators, the Abu Dhabi police and others. To escape from prosecution in the UAE Courts, the winner, the India-born Investor was fraudulently deported to India by the de facto head of UAE, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, kicked off all the Judgments pronounced by the Judiciary, absolutely in favour of the Indian investor. It also questions the integrity of the executive branch and officials of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

The Judgment Creditor, Abu Dhabi-based Indian Investor, contractor and supplier, who has been unable to get justice, lost his entire property, assets and real estate investments; irrecoverable loss of his 3 different business establishments & projects including General Contracting, Electro-Mechanical Est., Building Material Trading etc., worth above US$100 million in 1996, (Ten times the settlement amount won by the U.S. citizen who was tortured by the UAE royals in 1984) brought him in a deplorable health condition for an unduly long period of the past 22 years in spite of the stiff punitive orders slapped by the Supreme Court of that country against the culprits. …Read full text ‘A Fugitive From Law’. 

Last updated on 04th August, 2017

‘CROWDFUNDING STRATEGY TO ENFORCE UNSATISFIED
UAE JUDGMENTS’

“Support the “Judgment Creditor” to strengthen the Integrity of the Judiciary
and people’s confidence in our Justice System”.
“Invest In ‘UAE Judgments’ Min. 500% Returns! – Read Brochure”

READ FULL TEXT ‘MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR UAE JUDGMENT’ FOR SALE’
http://www.judgmentforsale.com/articles/multi-billion-dollar-uae-judgment-for-sale/

Crowdfunding Promoted by: ‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’

In support of:
Legal Cell; Lawyers India; Reparation Law; Judgment Creditor
https://www.Facebook.com/AllianceJudgmentRecovery/
https://www.Facebook.com/JudgmentForSale/
https://www.Facebook.com/ReparationLaw/
https://www.Facebook.com/RTIorders/
https://www.Twitter.com/JudgmentForSale/
https://www.Twitter.com/RepublicDay2017/
https://www.Twitter.com/ReparationLaw/

GLOBAL CAMPAIGN!

“Twenty one years of arbitrary detention in various forms by the UAE administration, denying fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of human dignity”.

IN THE UAE, “FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE INDIANS”

• First they came for the Indians, I remained silent – I was not an Indian;
  Then they came for the Europeans, I remained silent – I was not a European;
  Then they came for the Americans, I remained silent – I was not an American;
  Then they came for the Emiratis, I remained silent – I was not an Emirati;
  Then they came for the Qataris, I remained silent – I was not a Qatari;
  Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Link To Global Campaign

• ‘“Thanks to State Department Cables, a U.S.Torture Victim Won a Rare $10 Million Settlement against UAE ruling family” – The condition: ‘Silence in the Press’!
• ‘Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, is a fugitive from justice. The Government of India has also helped him remain a ‘fugitive debtor’ all these years! ‘A total shame for the so-called India-UAE relations’!
• ‘The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India’
• ‘The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’
• India’s Extradition Treaty With United Arab Emirates (UAE), The Worst Human Rights Abusers! – ‘A Flashback & The Recognition of Representation-1997′
• UAE Fraud: In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for the law abiding citizens!
• Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

Link To Articles

Photo Credits: Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed, head of the notorious State Security Apparatus in the UAE. [Inserted image: Mohammed Bin Zayed along with his brother Saif Bin Zayed, who is the Deputy Prime Minister of UAE since May 2009 and Minister of Interior since October 2004. He was the Deputy Director of the Capital Police in 1994–1995 before becoming the Director General of the Abu Dhabi Police on October 23, 1995]

A FUGITIVE FROM LAW: “SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN ZAYED, HEAD OF A REPRESSIVE REGIME, ABU DHABI, UAE, IS A FUGITIVE FROM LAW IN LEGAL TERM”.
July 10, 2017 New Delhi. [First Published In 'Reparation Law, News'] Download the authentic document of ‘A Fugitive From Law’ in PDF (Size: 1333 kb)

A ‘Fugitive From Law’: “Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed, Head of A Repressive Regime, Abu Dhabi, UAE, Is A Fugitive From Law In Legal Term”.

[In accordance with the spirit of UN Articles on Diplomatic Protection 2006 framed on 31 March, 2013 this report is published by ‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’, in support of the ‘Judgment Creditor’, who has been unable to get justice for an unduly long period of the past 21 years against one of the worst violations of Human Rights considered even globally, in spite of the passing of 4 consecutive Judgments from the UAE Courts, including the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi in his absolute favour, as well as two other judgments from the High Court of Delhi, which was moved after approaching the Hon. Supreme Court of India].

Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, is a fugitive from justice. The Government of India has also helped him remain a ‘fugitive debtor’ all these years! ‘A total shame for the so-called India-UAE relations’!!

The situation is now changing in view of the recent developments in India by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Hague, hearing on Kulbhushan Jadhav’s case. India could espouse a cause against Pakistan, a home to the second-largest number of Indian migrants after the UAE, when the life of an Indian citizen was threatened by actions of that country. Further punitive measures were stopped on the basis of interim orders passed by the International Court of Justice.

In extreme cases of deprivation of the most valuable Human Rights as in the case of the ‘Judgment Creditor’, one would justify for an Indian citizen seeking relief against a foreign state even before international justice flora. The ‘UAE fugitive’, who escaped from prosecution for the last 21 years, may feel the heat of these powerful legal provisions and machineries in the very near future.

Compared to Jadhav, who according to India Jadhav was kidnapped by Pakistani agents from Iran, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ is a noble citizen of India and factually, his ‘kidnapping’ and arbitrary detention were proved in the legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Hon. Court was issued investigation orders against Abu Dhabi police & a local Emirati, an associate of the office of the ‘Crown Prince’ of Abu Dhabi, (With whom a civil lawsuit was filed by the ‘Judgment Creditor’ in a dispute of an apartment tower) and stiff punitive orders were slapped by the Supreme Court of that country.

Instead of enforcement of judgments the ‘head of the Abu Dhabi, UAE (de facto ruler)’ has repeatedly obstructed the administration of justice to cover up his link with the heinous acts of the notorious state police. The injustices and cruelties by the Executive of Abu Dhabi, UAE, against the ‘Judgment Creditor’, an Indian investor, remains a serious case with highest credibility over any other case in India for the World Court.

The Indian investor had built up in Abu Dhabi, UAE an enviable business empire of Engineering, Trading & General Contracting, 3 different establishments with all sort of infrastructure including warehouses, fully equipped electro-mechanical lab, workshop, staff quarters and other real estate investments etc., that worth US$100 million apart from work contracts and reputation, with his prime years, commanding respect of many of his clients and well wishers in the region.

The investor was entrapped in a criminal case, kept isolated in hellholes in different detention centres and brutally tortured and traumatised. He was continued under detention arbitrarily under squalid conditions, often solitary confinement, in order to humiliate or degrade him and was inaccessible by any of his staff or counsels.

Nevertheless, he could fight his case by his own; whereupon the UAE Courts declared him innocent, the case was false; framed by Abu Dhabi policemen with malicious intentions. The Court ordered the state authority to prosecute both the policemen and the local Emirati. The Criminal Court observed that, the Interim Judgment of the Abu Dhabi Civil Court, ruled that the ‘Judgment Creditor’ [who was the petitioner in the said case] was the really aggrieved person and had deserved help.

The police dropped charges and plead guilty in the final stage of criminal proceedings. The Apex Court directed the authority to restore the Judgment Creditor’s dignity and compensate the ‘Judgment Creditor’ for all losses and sufferings inflicted upon by Abu Dhabi police.

In total negation of the Rule of Law of the country and kicking off all the Judgments pronounced by the Judiciary, including the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, the investor, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was deported from UAE with fraudulent claims by the ‘Emir’. Thus the ‘Emir’, the de facto ruler, turned himself to be a cruel Fugitive from Law to hide his face.

Thereafter, the personal representations to the Union Government of India, including the United Nations & the NHRC, and legal proceedings were initiated in India by the victim, the ‘Judgment Creditor’. All his pursuit of justice for the past two decades turned in vain, despite 2 Judgments from the Delhi High Court in 1997 & 2007 respectively, directing the Union Government to settle the case with their UAE counterpart.

The Government of India was in a clear breach of its obligations by ignoring the monstrous injustices and cruelties inflicted upon an Indian citizen, the irrecoverable loss of his huge business assets, the deplorable condition of his health, and most important of all, a portfolio of 4 consecutive Judgments absolutely in his favour by the learned Judges of the different Courts of a foreign state, Abu Dhabi, UAE, including the Apex Court.

The ‘Judgment Creditor’, an investor in UAE, had to undergo extremes of violence and abuses by the Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi [Including the 'wilful inactions' by the government of India] consist of:-

a) He was literally kidnapped from his office and huge money was looted from his office by the police officials of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

b) He was brutally tortured, and detained in hellholes under squalid conditions for a long period, in order to blackmail him to withdraw a civil lawsuit, against a local Emirati.

c) His younger brother was also tortured and severely traumatized in front of him to withdraw the civil lawsuit and extort money from the ‘Judgment Creditor’.

d) During this long spell of illegal detention, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was denied wholesome food, drinking water, medical attention and was inaccessible by his staff or counsels.

e) He was held arbitrarily in different detention centres, often solitary confinement without basic amenities, throughout the period of detention and trial, which ruined his entire life.

f) The Legal Court of First Instance of Abu Dhabi was declared that the conduct of the policemen clearly proved the malicious motives in initiating a criminal complaint against the ‘Judgment Creditor’. The police dropped charges framed against the ‘Judgment Creditor’ and plead guilty in the legal court after an investigation orders passed against police. However, an order of enquiry passed by the Legal Court against the conduct of the Policemen (and beyond) was ignored by the Abu Dhabi authority. The conduct of the Prosecutor too was condemned.

g) His detention, malicious and deliberate misuse of power, were continued even after the Trial Court Judgment, after a full and fair trial acquitted him, the ‘Judgment Creditor’.

h) The Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE, passed stiff punitive orders against the Abu Dhabi police and strongly condemned the prosecution in its ‘Landmark Judgment’ but the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was not released from prison.

i) All the four expeditious Judicial Verdicts of Abu Dhabi Courts were repeatedly obstructed, kicked off and violated the basic principles of a civilized Government of honouring verdict of the judiciary, Executive abiding by such verdict.

j) All these atrocities that took place against the ‘Judgment Creditor’, when the final decision of his civil lawsuit on an apartment tower, was due to be announced by the Legal Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE. As the petitioner of existing civil lawsuit, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ had already received an Interim Judgment from the Hon’ ble Court in his favour.

k) Worst still, even after the Appellate Court affirming the decision of the trial Court, entitling the ‘Judgment Creditor’ to be set at liberty and receive back all assets deprived, and other rights and privileges restored, the ‘Head’ of Abu Dhabi, UAE, fraudulently ordered the deportation of the ‘Judgment Creditor’ from UAE instead, with only his ‘wearing apparel’, to be back in India.

l) He had built up in Abu Dhabi a group of businesses of Engineering, Trading & Contracting and assets worth US$100 million way back in 1995. He lost all his investments and business assets as an aftermath of his illegal deportation.

m) Refusal of the government of India, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), to consider the representations of the ‘Judgment Creditor’ detailing the patent violation of Human Rights by the UAE, despite 4 consecutive Judgments from the UAE Courts, and 2 other Judgments from the High Court of Delhi after approaching the Hon. Supreme Court of India.

n) The ‘Judgment Creditor’ is still under arbitrary detention in various forms, denying his property, fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of his human dignity for the last 21 years that followed.

There cannot be any doubt or dispute about the averments of the ‘Judgment Creditor’, all the claims he had made, as they are fully supported by the orders of Courts both India and UAE, and the official documents of the governments of India UAE.

Under international law, the state is responsible for all actions or omissions of its officials and organs. This is the function of the basic rules of international law concerning the responsibility of States for their internationally wrongful acts and the legal consequences which flow there-from. The ‘successor governments’ also remain bound by the acts incurred by the ‘predecessor governments’.

The evidence is supplemented and corroborated by other documents produced hereunder and enumerated to the sake of convenience.

READ FULL TEXT ‘MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR UAE JUDGMENT’ FOR SALE’
http://www.judgmentforsale.com/articles/multi-billion-dollar-uae-judgment-for-sale/

END NOTE

The State practice of International Law in India, no doubt, is purely based on vote-bank politics and not for the administration of justice. The India-US row in 2013-14 over the arrest of Deputy consul-general Devyani Khobragade, who was indicted for visa fraud in New York (who also blatantly violated the Indian passport act), has revealed this dirty secret.

Nevertheless, no justification whatsoever can exist for India’s erroneous inaction for more than two decades for such lapses. And those Judgments remain unexecuted even after 21 years of their signing by the Abu Dhabi judiciary, UAE, perhaps a unique phenomenon, most eligible to be recorded in Guinness Book!

Promoted by: ‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’

In support of:
Legal Cell; Lawyers India; Reparation Law; Judgment Creditor
https://www.Facebook.com/AllianceJudgmentRecovery/
https://www.Facebook.com/JudgmentForSale/
https://www.Facebook.com/ReparationLaw/
https://www.Facebook.com/RTIorders/
https://www.Twitter.com/JudgmentForSale/
https://www.Twitter.com/RepublicDay2017/
https://www.Twitter.com/ReparationLaw/

GLOBAL CAMPAIGN!

“Twenty one years of arbitrary detention in various forms by the UAE administration, denying fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of human dignity”.

IN THE UAE, “FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE INDIANS”

• First they came for the Indians, I remained silent – I was not an Indian;
  Then they came for the Europeans, I remained silent – I was not a European;
  Then they came for the Americans, I remained silent – I was not an American;
  Then they came for the Emiratis, I remained silent – I was not an Emirati;
  Then they came for the Qataris, I remained silent – I was not a Qatari;
  Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Link To Global Campaign

• ‘The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India’
• ‘The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’
• India’s Extradition Treaty With United Arab Emirates (UAE), The Worst Human Rights Abusers! – ‘A Flashback & The Recognition of Representation-1997′
• UAE Fraud: In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for the law abiding citizens!
• Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

Link To Articles

The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’

May 23, 2017 New Delhi. [First Published In 'Airlines India']

The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’

The article about Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi, appeared sometime back in the Nationalae, [a government-owned English-language newspaper published in Abu Dhabi] exposed just a little bit of truth and full of lies of the most notorious prison in Abu Dhabi, UAE. The author of the article was not in a position to reveal the facts about the cruelties and brutal conditions once existed there, and the changes that have taken place to respect the Human Rights.

This ‘Judgment Creditor’, an Indian investor, was arbitrarily detained at Al Wathba Prison, in order to withdraw a civil lawsuit in his favour in 1995 – 96. His opponents were not ordinary criminals, they were the ‘custodians of the law’ and the de facto ruler of the Abu Dhabi, UAE. Despite his holding 4 consecutive Judgments absolutely in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts including the Supreme Court, he was deported by them to save face further to escape from the Court ordered reparations.

On reaching India, he took up his case [the non-execution of the 'Court Judgments including the Investigation Orders' against the Abu Dhabi Police and beyond], along with the pleas and sufferings of hundreds of Al-Wathba prisoners to the United Nations, International NGO’s including the media.

Dear readers are requested to go through (please do) the materials and documents furnished herein below and realize the type of torture and ill-treatments that were given in those days to the inmates at Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi.

THE SITUATION IN ‘CENTRAL PRISON, AL WATHBA, ABU DHABI, UAE’ IN 1995 – 1996 – AS SEEN BY THE JUDGMENT CREDITOR:-

The Wathba Central prison was overcrowded with more than three thousand prisoners, mostly Indian nationals. In scorching heat of the desert, within concrete cages, prisoners were made to live in inhuman conditions without the basic necessities of life. Not even a fan was provided in those concrete cages.

Hundreds of ‘prisoners’ rotting in different blocks who have lost their mental balance and the ability to lead a normal life once they are released. Visiting dignitaries were led through separate corridors of the prison where there is discipline and respect for law.

ONLY ROTTEN AND SPOILED FOOD WERE GIVEN TO THE PRISONERS:-

The food was most unpalatable and unhygienic. Prisoners sustain their life with fermented camel meat and wormy food-grains and clamoured there for a glass of cold water in the hot summer days.

Many prisoners were dumped in the corridors and pinning for a little cool breeze. Even a breath of fresh air was a precious boon for them! The heartening fact is that many innocents are made to languish here under the banner of criminals which cast a stigma on them for life.

IT’S REALLY USEFUL FOR THE RESEARCHERS IF THEY READ THE CONTENT OF LINKS GIVEN BELOW:

1) The Whistle blower (‘Judgment Creditor’) who reported revelations about Abu Dhabi prison conditions – (Press Release November, 1996)
http://www.judgmentforsale.com/publish/my-prison-life-al-wathba-abu-chabi.pdf

2) Letter to the ‘Judgment Creditor’ from the Office of United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva – 26 December, 1996
http://www.uaeleaks.com/united_nations_office_geneva_1997.html

3) The letters of appreciations to the ‘Judgment Creditor’, in the progress of prison conditions by his ex-inmates Al Wathba, Abu Dhabi.

(a) George Titus Valliazham, Block 6, Al Wathba, Abu Dhabi.
http://www.judgmentforsale.com/al_wathba_central_prison_abudhabi_uae_censored_letters.html#George

(b) Abdulla Khoori, Block 3, Al Wathba, Abu Dhabi.
http://www.judgmentforsale.com/al_wathba_central_prison_abudhabi_uae_censored_letters.html#Khoori

4) Article published in The Sunday Pioneer, Delhi, May 17, 1998
http://www.judgmentforsale.com/publish/al-wathba-prison-united-arab-emirates.pdf

5) Article By the National ae., the culture of deception and secrecy
http://www.thenational.ae/uae/courts/20140621/revealed-what-lifes-really-like-inside-a-prison-in-abu-dhabi

‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’ Launches Global Campaign to Expose the UAE fraudster(s) and its counterparts in India, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the Government of India, who fooled the whole world for the last two decades, in this case.

“Twenty one years of arbitrary detention in various forms by the UAE administration, denying fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of human dignity”.

The UAE has so far failed to recognize and protect the rights to justice despite 4 consecutive judgments in absolute in favour of an Indian investor, the ‘Judgment Creditor’. He was denied dignity, respect, his freedom and access to his business assets spread over three establishments in Abu Dhabi, UAE from 1995. All that pending is the ‘execution of those Judgements, solely due to the inhuman approach of the concerned authorities representing both India and UAE.

The State practice of International Law in India is purely based on vote-bank politics. No justification can exist for ignoring such an extreme violations of Human Rights. ‘Full Text’

‘Judgment For Sale’ is a global campaign, primarily organized by voluntary member contributions. It’s a value added, investment campaign, aimed to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud or other heinous acts to avoid honouring their obligations.

As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the winner has every right to offer his un-executed Judgments for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity.

Promoted by: ‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’

In support of:
Legal Cell; Lawyers India; Reparation Law; Judgment Creditor
https://www.Facebook.com/AllianceJudgmentRecovery/
https://www.Facebook.com/JudgmentForSale/
https://www.Facebook.com/ReparationLaw/
https://www.Facebook.com/RTIorders/
https://www.Twitter.com/JudgmentForSale/
https://www.Twitter.com/RepublicDay2017/
https://www.Twitter.com/ReparationLaw/

Link To Global Campaign

• India’s Extradition Treaty With United Arab Emirates (UAE), The Worst Human Rights Abusers! – ‘A Flashback & The Recognition of Representation-1997′

• UAE Fraud: In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for the law abiding citizens!

• Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

Link To Articles

• 1) Multi Billion Dollar UAE Judgments’ For Sale’
• 2) ‘Judgment Creditor Booklet to Enforce UAE Judgments’
• 3) “Marking the 20th Anniversary of the Abu Dhabi Police-Looting”
• 4) Unique is the Case of ‘Judgment Creditor’ – “The White Paper“
• 5) “The Worst Cheating Scandal of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates”
• 6) Real-life ‘Judgment Fraud’ by the UAE Administration Uncovered!
• 7) Khobragade Scandal sheds new light on India’s ‘Rotten Diplomacy’!
• 8) Truth and Justice are being nakedly sacrificed for “UAE Reputation”
• 9) The legacy of torture in the UAE; you may have never heard of!
• 10) India’s “National Shame”, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA)!
• 11) Representation to Government of India for ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’
• 12) Representation – Years of Human Rights Abuses in the GCC Member States!
• 13) Serious Breaches of Obligations Under Peremptory Norms of the UAE Law!
• 14) Representation to Government of India on ‘India-UAE Extradition Treaty 1997′!
• 15) First Human Rights Learning Centre in the History of United Arab Emirates (UAE)
• 16) What Man, Defy the Devil; Save Mankind from Dictators!
• 17) Reparation Law
• 18) Publications
• 19) Archives

VISIT ARCHIVES:-
Judgments and documents relating to ‘Judgment Creditor’

LET’S JOIN; TELL YOUR PROGRESSIVE FRIENDS TO SUPPORT JUSTICE
“Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks”

CROWDFUNDING STRATEGY TO ENFORCE UAE JUDGMENTS

“Support the “Judgment Creditor” to strengthen the Integrity of the Judiciary and people’s confidence in our Justice System”.
“Invest In ‘Justice’ Min. 500% Returns! – Read Brochure”

FREE REFERRAL PARTNER PROGRAMME:-

How do I become a ‘Referral Partner’?
“Referral Partner Program is Absolutely Free to Join“

An Open Appeal to all Indians on the Occasion of the 68th Anniversary of India’s Republic Day 2017!

Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

An Open Appeal to all Indians on the Occasion of the 68th Anniversary of India’s Republic Day 2017!

If We Really Stand For The Independent India, The Values of Democracy and Respect For Human Rights: “Observe The Republic Day of India 2017 As ‘Black Day’, on the following Crystal Clear Reasons:-

Abu Dhabi crown prince, Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, is invited to be the chief guest of India’s Republic Day 2017. To add fuel to the fire the “UAE Army has also been invited to participate in the Republic Day Parade 2017″ during which the chief guest will be the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi.

Mohammed Bin Zayed represents the UAE as the de facto ruler of UAE Federation. UAE is attributed to authoritarian regime with blood-stained hands, lacks accountability and total lack of judicial independence. Any one who dares to criticize the regime risk arrest, torture, arbitrary detentions and enforced disappearance.

The Army in question was trained by the notorious company once known as ‘BlackWater’, and recruited foreign mercenaries, originally intended to butcher their citizens who claim for democracy. The UAE is a member of Saudi-led ‘anti-terror’ coalition on which the Pakistani army chief [retired] Gen Raheel Sharif is the head.

The UAE and its army both have proved by meddling its neighbouring countries that the victory of the people against any repressive regime in the Arab world is more dangerous than defeat!

ENFORCEMENT OF LANDMARK UAE JUDGMENTS – ‘JABIR CASE’

Most importantly, there’s no respect for even the Judgments of the Supreme Court of that country. The UAE Federation is the worst wilful defaulter of the 4 consecutive Judgments passed against them by the Courts of Abu Dhabi in the most shocking and gruesome case of an Indian investor’. During the course of hearing the wrong-doers pleaded guilty ‘of their framing a false case against the Indian investor’ to withdraw a civil lawsuit of a building contract.

The Court of First Instance in Abu Dhabi, UAE, had specifically ordered investigation against their corrupt and conniving officials who looted money and valuables from the office of Indian investor. The Full Bench of the Apex Court unanimously upheld the findings, precisely in line with the Lower Courts’ Judgments.

The UAE Federation did not comply with the Judicial directives of the Courts of Abu Dhabi. Instead, the Federation deliberately and maliciously deported him, the ‘Judgment Creditor’, from the UAE, denying him access even to his business assets spread over three establishments in Abu Dhabi, UAE, were worth One Hundred Million US Dollars in 1995.

This resulted his character assassination, leaving him in a whirl-pool of unimaginable mental trauma and thus the UAE Federation is accountable for its violation of Judicial decisions at first place.

His claims against UAE were recognized by both the Supreme Court and the High Court of Delhi and ordered the Government of India to settle the case in two months, way back in 1997! All that is pending is the ‘execution of those Judgements, solely due to the inhuman approach of the concerned authorities representing both India and UAE.

A vicarious liability exists under general law. The violation of a specific directive of a Court of Law, renders the Abu Dhabi, UAE Federation, as a ‘Wilful Defaulter’, liable for the compensation due to the Petitioner, the ‘Judgment Creditor’.

Under the above grave backgrounds, the Abu Dhabi crown prince cannot be made in a list of the distinguished chief guests of India’s Republic Day Celebrations. The Republic Day of India commemorates the date January 26, 1950, on which the Constitution of India came into force.

Indians celebrated Republic Day all these years to strengthen the dynamics of a democratic values and to honour India’s great men and women who had sacrificed all the way. We were quite fair so far, when we had distinguished personalities like Obama, Hollande etc., as our Chief Guests on our Republic Day ceremonies in the past.

The ‘Judgment Creditor’ is therefore soliciting your wholehearted support in his unique case to get Justice, in a portfolio of Landmark Judgments passed in absolute in his favour, by the highest Judiciary of Abu Dhabi and subsequent Judgments from Delhi High Court in the case, the benefits of which have been denied to him arbitrarily and inhumanly over an unduly long period of two decades, defeating all his relentless fight.

The ‘Judgment Creditor’ wishes to observe India’s Republic Day 2017 as a Black Day, in Protest Against the Non-enforcement of Legal Judgments” by both the Governments, the Government of UAE and the Government of India!

He requests all Indians to join him in his protest against the decision of the Government of India with all supports to him.

Promoted by: ‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’

In support of:
Legal Cell; Lawyers India; Reparation Law; Judgment Creditor
https://www.Facebook.com/AllianceJudgmentRecovery/
https://www.Facebook.com/JudgmentForSale/
https://www.Twitter.com/JudgmentForSale/
https://www.Twitter.com/RepublicDay2017/

Link To Articles

• 1) Multi Billion Dollar UAE Judgments’ For Sale’
• 2) ‘Judgment Creditor Booklet to Enforce UAE Judgments’
• 3) “Marking the 20th Anniversary of the Abu Dhabi Police-Looting”
• 4) Unique is the Case of ‘Judgment Creditor’ – “The White Paper“
• 5) “The Worst Cheating Scandal of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates”
• 6) Real-life ‘Judgment Fraud’ by the UAE Administration Uncovered!
• 7) Khobragade Scandal sheds new light on India’s ‘Rotten Diplomacy’!
• 8) Truth and Justice are being nakedly sacrificed for “UAE Reputation”
• 9) The legacy of torture in the UAE; you may have never heard of!
• 10) India’s “National Shame”, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA)!
• 11) Representation to Government of India for ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’
• 12) Representation – Years of Human Rights Abuses in the GCC Member States!
• 13) Serious Breaches of Obligations Under Peremptory Norms of the UAE Law!
• 14) Representation to Government of India on ‘India-UAE Extradition Treaty 1997′!
• 15) First Human Rights Learning Centre in the History of United Arab Emirates (UAE)
• 16) Reparation Law
• 17) Publications
• 18) Archives

VISIT ARCHIVES:-
Judgments and documents relating to ‘Judgment Creditor’

LET’S JOIN; TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO SUPPORT JUSTICE
“Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks”

CROWDFUNDING STRATEGY TO ENFORCE UAE JUDGMENTS

“Support the “Judgment Creditor” to strengthen the Integrity of the Judiciary and people’s confidence in our Justice System”.
“Invest In ‘Justice’ 1,000% Returns! – Read Brochure”

FREE REFERRAL PARTNER PROGRAMME:-

How do I become a ‘Referral Partner’?
“Referral Partner Program is Absolutely Free to Join“

MULTI BILLION $USD WORTH ‘JUDGMENT-DEBTS’ OF UAE FOR SALE!

Wednesday 19 Oct, 2016 New Delhi [Reparation Law News] ‘Download ‘Authentic Copy (PDF: 1200 kb)‘

MULTI BILLION $USD WORTH ‘JUDGMENT-DEBTS’ OF UAE: – THE ‘UAE JUDGMENT DEBTS’ AGAINST THE ‘ABU DHABI EXECUTIVE BRANCH’ ARE GUARANTEED “TEN TIMES MORE VALUE IN THREE YEARS PERIOD” AND FIVE TIMES MORE VALUE ON YOUR INVESTMENT EVEN IF THE DEBTORS SETTLE IT WITHIN THE FIRST WEEK OF YOUR JOINING!
READ FULL TEXT: “SALE BROCHURE”!

1) INTRODUCTION.
Article submitted by Panikkaveetil K. Jabir, Founder-CEO, M/s. Overseas Indians Legal Cell (hereinafter referred to as the Judgment Creditor).

The Judgment Creditor is an Indian National. Despite the social and other difficulties, the Judgment Creditor established a career as Electro-Mechanical Engineer. He had valuable experience in the said field by working in projects of International Repute like Voltas and Lufthansa in Mumbai, India.

In the prime of his youth, when aged 22, he reached Abu Dhabi, the capital of the UAE in 1979. UAE at that time was a fast developing country. He had been an active participant in its developmental activities. Due to tireless efforts and commitment to his profession, he could establish and develop three major business establishments in Engineering, Trading and General Contracting in Abu Dhabi that valued at about a hundred million U.S. Dollars by 1995.

2) BEGINNING OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION.

The Judgment Creditor, on behalf of his principal company, the ‘Premier General Contracting Establishment’, entered into a lease and build-out agreement with Hassan Saeed Hassan, a local Emirati, in September 1995, regarding a nine storied building.

With the rapid progress of the proposed project, Hassan Saeed grew greedy, and conspired to have the lease obligation set at naught with a view to make enormous gains. the Judgment Creditor could not and did not yield to the unjustified demands of Mr. Hassan Saeed, as the Judgment Creditor had already entered into commitments with others on the basis of the planned business deal.

3) FIRST APPROACH TO THE COURT OF LAW.

When Hassan Saeed attempted to break the provisions in the lease agreement, and even sold some of the flats to others violating the terms and conditions of the contract, the Judgment Creditor, as a law abiding citizen, sought legal advice and instituted a civil suit in the Abu Dhabi Court.

Hassan Saeed was, however, reacting in a most unreasonable and arbitrary manner. He threatened the Judgment Creditor with dire consequences if he failed to withdraw the Civil Suit.

The Court was, prima facie, satisfied by the contentions of the Judgment Creditor, and passed an interim order protecting his rights. There was a direction to deposit the contracted value in the Treasury. Hassan Saeed was informed about the direction and the possible serious consequences in the event of his illegal action and violation of the Court order were indicated.

4) THE GRUESOME ACTS OF VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

The stand taken by the Judgment Creditor was lawful, reasonable, and had the support of the Court’s interim order. ‘But in total negation of the Judicial Order of Abu Dhabi Civil Court, Hassan Saeed continued threatening the Judgment Creditor and planned and executed violent and reckless revenge, defying all legal provisions and principles of fair-play. Certain corrupt police officials colluded with him. In consequence thereof, the Judgment Creditor had to undergo extremes of inhuman and deadly tortures from Abu Dhabi Police which no human being could withstand. However, he was fortunate to be spared from death.

The crude and cruel manner of the attempts to break the contract i.e. the aggression, police-looting and the connivance of local police, illegal arrest, arbitrary detention, malicious claim, torture etc., are detailed chronologically in a Representation [link] submitted to the Ministry of External Affairs, Delhi, on 28 October, 2013 in reply of its Letter [link] No.G/3139/2013/MEA (Gulf Division) dated 10th October, 2013. Some of the events [link] are also featured in the following articles. The Judgment Creditor may continue the narrative in brief herein so as to complete the story.
————————————————————————————————————————————
['Judgment Creditor Booklet to Enforce UAE Judgments'; 'The Uniqueness of Judgment Creditor'; 'Abu Dhabi Police-looting'; 'The Worst Cheating Scandal of Abu Dhabi Debtor'; “Truth and Justice are being nakedly sacrificed for UAE’s Reputation”; Untold sufferings inflicted as an under-trial prisoner at the brutal 'Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi', detailed herein 'The legacy of torture in the UAE' and 'The Prison-life in Abu Dhabi'; 'The Loss of Business Firms & Assets of the Judgment Creditor In Abu Dhabi, UAE'; ' And more.']
————————————————————————————————————————————
On Thursday 26th October 1995 around Noon, Hassan Saeed trespassed into the private office of the Judgment Creditor along with his accomplice, a policeman in plain clothes, who held a heavy iron rod of one meter length in one hand and a chained handcuff on the other hand.

The policeman enquired as to the original documents of the contract which the Judgment Creditor refused to disclose. On this, the entire office was ransacked, drawers opened by force and files thrown out. Thereupon, the policeman forcibly broke open the office locker with the iron rod in his hand and looted US$.4m worth money and valuables and the Judgment Creditor was severely beaten in cold blood and his fingers were smashed with iron rod.

At this juncture, the younger brother of the Judgment Creditor arrived at the office with lunch. As he arrived the Judgment Creditor asked him to close the door and call the police. By then, the policeman in plain clothes managed to get out of the office with the stolen money and valuables; however, Mr.Hassan Saeed was unable to leave.

It was noticed by the Judgment Creditor that the policeman in civil dress had returned and was shouting and striking on the door with the heavy iron rod of one meter length he held in his hand. By then an inquisitive crowd had gathered around the office of the Judgment Creditor. The policeman was shouting and warning anyone from coming near to him and was saying rather rudely “Pakistani, Bengali, Indian all are thieves and procurers”.

After some time, the police patrol team arrived at the spot as per the request made by the Judgment Creditor. But instead of protecting him from the trespassers, they joined hands with the trespassers, acted like mere savages, and the victims (the Judgment Creditor and his brother) were shackled, brutally tortured and were literally dragged out of the office through the street to the police vehicle in the presence of known friends and bystanders and taken to an underground detention centre. They were abused and assaulted there again and the Judgment Creditor fell unconscious. Eventually they were taken to hospital emergency.

5) ARBITRARY ARREST AND DETENTION – A VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

The wanton acts of infraction of damage to the Judgment Creditor, his office and equipment were temporarily halted only when, pursuant to a telephone call of the Judgment Creditor’s brother, a police team arrived at the scene. In the mean time, a large crowd had gathered at the scene, and there were very many respectable persons from different parts of the world who could witness the incident.

Unfortunately, the police team acted in accordance with the dictates of Hassan Saeed, due to extraneous considerations and undue influence, money and otherwise. Hassan Saeed manipulated, with the connivance of police, the arrest and detention of the Judgment Creditor.

Thus the business deal bona fide entered into, and scrupulously adhered to by the Judgment Creditor, led to very serious deprivation of his liberty, which consisted of a series of violations of Human Rights such as a forcible destruction of his property with the connivance of corrupt police officials, illegal arrest, torture of the worst order leading to his unconscious condition, perilously near death, incarceration in prison, and other physical and mental sufferings. It took about six months for the Judgment Creditor being brought before a Court of law of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

6) A CONTENTION ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION ARISING FROM THE ARREST.

It is respectfully submitted that this default in not producing the accused promptly before a competent judicial authority, by itself is a serious violation of the rights guaranteed to a victim under the fundamental principles of international law. The Judgment Creditor was not produced before a Court, i.e. within a day, or some of the weeks. It took a long period of six months thereafter, for the Judgment Creditor to have his first appearance in the Court.

He was held incommunicado for about a month in different detention centres, often in solitary confinement, and finally taken to the central prison. During this long spell of illegal detention, he was treated in the most cruel manner, subjected to brutal torture and blackmail, causing him irreparable mental and physical injuries. The Judgment Creditor was exposed to such a gross violation of Human Rights which the competent authority could take serious notice of. Each day of such illegal incarceration is to be reckoned while devising the remedial measures.
————————————————————————————————————————————
Article 9 (3) is particularly relevant and read:

“Any one arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a Judge or other officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release”. [Link: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations].

& the UAE had breached Articles 9 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) that condemns arbitrary arrest: ‘No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile. [Link: Universal Declaration of Human Rights]
————————————————————————————————————————————
7) THE LEGAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE, ABU DHABI, UAE.

The Human Rights Violations, the assault, arbitrary detention etc as narrated above were scrutinized by the Court. The Court had the opportunity to have evidence before it from witnesses belonging to different nationalities.

The witnesses of foreign nationals (other than Indian) were in a position to give evidences, despite the fear of a possible harassment by Abu Dhabi Police and public prosecution. This ensured the independent quality of the evidence.

The arrest and detention were against the basic principles of law. The arrogant policemen of Abu Dhabi, however, committed the atrocities in full view of the public. This proved to be their undoing.

8) THE REACTION OF THE COURT.

The Court expressed its shock while noticing that a victim who sought for police help from trespassers was arrested and detained by the police!

9) THE JUDGMENT AND FINDINGS OF THE COURT.

The Judgment of the ‘Legal Court of First Instance’ was pronounced on 10-04-1996.

The Judgment Creditor and his brother who were charged with offences by the Abu Dhabi Police, were acquitted. The Court directed the Authorities, to prosecute the policeman involved in the illegal activities. It was found that Hassan Saeed was guilty of deception and assault. The Court criticized the Public Prosecution for concealing the assault of the policeman on the Judgment Creditor, and its tampering of evidence. Some of the material findings of the Court are:-

i) The policeman and Hassan Saeed had committed the offences of trespass and assault.

ii) The Judgment Creditor had only exercised his legal right, and he and his brother were attacked by the policeman and Hassan Saeed by taking the law into their hand.

iii) The police, which was expected to help the victims, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the law breakers.

iv) The Criminal Court observed that, the Interim Judgment of the Abu Dhabi Civil Court, ruled that the Judgment Creditor was the really aggrieved person and had deserved help.

v) The conduct of the police clearly proved the malicious motives in initiating the criminal complaint against the Judgment Creditor.

vi) Ultimately, the Court found that the policeman indulged in the illegal criminal act due to his greed, and that the police framed false charges against the Judgment Creditor to save their face.

10) DIRECTIONS OF COURT – AN ENQUIRY INTO THE CONDUCT OF POLICE.

The Court took a serious view of the entire events. It ordered an enquiry into the conduct of the police. The records were forwarded to the Public Prosecution for facilitating the investigation.

The order of the Court, regrettably enough, was ignored by the UAE authority. No investigation was conducted by the prosecution. The irresistible inference is about an active Police-partisanship to help the law-breakers, who wanted to make wrongful gains, utilizing their influence, and access to the ruling power.

The State has to bear the responsibility for such illegal actions indulged in by servants and officers and for helping anti-social elements with the full connivance of its policemen and other officials.

The claim of the Judgment Creditor is based on solid judicial verdict of a Court of the very country in which the illegal actions took place. [Link: The Judgment of the 'Court of First Instance - Final Decree' ]

11) SERIOUS VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE CHARTER OF THE U.N.

The Judgment Creditor was NOT released from prison in spite of his acquittal by the Criminal Court of First Instance, in total violation of the order of a judicial authority.

At the same time, there was an alleged omission to proceed against the perpetrators of the crime, in spite of the directions of a judicial authority. This too is a serious violation of Human Rights guaranteed by the law, both the domestic law and the charter of United Nations.

12) CONTINUATION OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE APEX COURT.

Ultimately, the prosecution filed an appeal in the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi. The case was posted for hearing on 18-04-1996.

13) APEX COURT ORDER GRANTING BAIL TO THE ‘JUDGMENT CREDITOR’.

The Court granted bail to the Judgment Creditor on the day the prosecution filing an appeal. However, despite the bail and sureties the Judgment Creditor was not released from the prison.

14) INTERVENING EVENTS CONFIRMING VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND ADMISSION OF POLICE ABOUT SUCH VIOLATIONS.

In the meantime, policeman Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Kadir filed a declaration dated 17-03-1996, attested by a Notary, where-under he dropped the contentions in his complaint. Hassan Saeed followed the suit and admitted his guilt. The two other policemen submitted that they were misguided by Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Kadir in committing arrest and torture against the Judgment Creditor with a view to extort money.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court advised the Judgment Creditor to sue against the perpetrators of the crime for damages and malicious actions.

15) JUDGMENT OF UAE SUPREME COURT WHICH AFFIRMED THE LANDMARK RULING OF LOWER COURT.

The final Judgment of the Supreme Court was rendered on 19-05-1996. The Hon’ble Supreme Court declared that the Judgment Creditor was totally innocent of the charges. The case hoisted against the Judgment Creditor was wholly false, baseless and fabricated by the police for personal gains. The Court observed further that all the pieces of evidence proved propriety in the acts and conduct of the Judgment Creditor.

The conduct of the Prosecutor was strongly condemned. Referring to the principles of Islamic Law, the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi observed that the law had honoured the man who protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. A person dying while protecting that freedom is considered a ‘martyr’.

With regard to the facts of the case, Supreme Court observed that it was proved that the policemen and other officials sought to arrest the Judgment Creditor without any right and that they curtailed his freedom.

[Link: The Judgment of the 'Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE]

16) UAE GOVERNMENT CONTINUED VIOLATION OF COURT ORDERS AND PERPETRATED VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

The defiant Executive, however, continued the violation of Human Rights. Despite the acquittal by the Trial Court, the grant of bail by the Supreme Court and dropping the charges by his complainant, and finally, the Supreme Court’s declaration precisely in line with the Lower Courts that the Judgment Creditor was totally innocent of the charges, the ongoing arbitrary detention of Judgment Creditor and his brother continued indefinitely.

17) CONTENTION AGAINST THE NON ENFORCEMENT OF UAE COURT’S DECISIONS.

The eminent Jurists Panel of Apex Court cross-examined all aspects of the case and found that the accused was innocent; rather ‘a martyr’. This judgment of the very country in which the police and the Executive Officers perpetrated violation of Human Rights against the Judgment Creditor, held that the Police was answerable for their criminal action.

The ‘Debtor’, the Government of Abu Dhabi, UAE, is responsible for such a grave violation of Human Rights and reparation is legitimately to be reckoned for every day of the deprivation of liberty and violation of Human Rights by the officers and servants of the UAE.

18) AGGRAVATED VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY [FRAUD] DEPORTATION RESULTING IN LOSS OF HIS DIGNITY, RESPECT AND ENTIRE PROPERTY.

Strangely enough, and shocking, the judicial conscience, and giving a jolt to the basic concept of Human Rights, the Judgment Creditor was deported on 28- 09-1996 to India with false and fabricated records without any asset, dignity and respect whatsoever. [Link: The 'Executive Order of Deportation' - an ‘extremely fraudulent misrepresentation’, dated 28-09-1996 Abu Dhabi, UAE]

Yet another gross violation of Human Rights was the dare devil action of the Executive of deporting the Judgment Creditor from the country as if the Judgment Creditor was convicted for a crime by the ‘Court of Law’, ignoring the concurrent judicial declaration of the Courts in UAE, the Court of First Instance and the Supreme Court. While so deporting the Judgment Creditor, the Executive Branch was well aware that ‘the reason shown in the deportation order was against the truth.

The deportation order was prepared with the false and fabricated statement, with an intention to save face and simultaneously to avoid paying any reparations. The fraud committed by the Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi has caused grave injury to the Judgment Creditor, that has left him in the worst position than he was in before the fraud.

The U.S. Supreme Court has quoted that, “There can be no doubt that the continuation of a malicious prosecution beyond the initial act of instigation may inflict additional damage upon the victim”.

The competent authority could be justified to pass further orders appropriately dealing with the concerned officers and compensating the Judgment Creditor by awarding compensation which will take in the value of his businesses, freedom or dignity and the assets, lost by him due to the criminal actions of the administration and other officials of the UAE, along with other heads of damages permissible under law.
————————————————————————————————————————————
The U.S. Supreme Court has quoted that, “There can be no doubt that the continuation of a malicious prosecution beyond the initial act of instigation may inflict additional damage upon the victim”; [Ray Wong v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc. (1926) 199 Cal. 15 [247 P. 894]. ‘The term ‘prosecution’ is sufficiently comprehensive to include every step in an action from its commencement to its final determination…’ (Lujan v. Gordon, 70 Cal.App.3d 260.)
————————————————————————————————————————————
19) CONTENTIONS REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF UAE GOVERNMENT.

It may be recalled that the UAE government was blamed of having been instrumental in defrauding or cheating the Judgment Creditor to avoid honoring its moral obligations and assigned responsibilities. The Judgment Creditor was subjected to total deprivation of his liberty, his business establishments, loss of his accumulated savings and properties, and a great suffering in his dignity as a human individual. Each deprivation by itself justifies the strongest action by the competent authority, in the light of the solid evidence placed before it.

Deprivation of the entire property and life savings constitute a grave violation of Human Rights and the very Right to Life. There are multiple infractions of Human Rights, which constitute a more serious case calling for strongest action on the part of the competent authority. The right to livelihood cannot be subjected to individual fancies of the person in authority.

20) ATTRIBUTION OF CONDUCT TO THE STATE.

The ‘Debtor, the Government of Abu Dhabi, UAE‘ will stand as the fiscally responsible party until the Court Judgment is satisfied. His responsibility to do so will pass on to his successor-in-office; the successor regime is obliged to compensate the victim of state wrongs.

Under international law, the state is responsible for all actions or omissions of its officials and organs. This is the function of the basic rules of international law concerning the responsibility of States for their internationally wrongful acts and the legal consequences which flow therefrom. The ‘successor governments’ also remain bound by the acts incurred by the ‘predecessor governments’.

A three-judge Supreme Court bench in India has observed recently that Decree Holders must enjoy the fruits of the decree obtained by them in an expeditious manner – “It is necessary to remember that success in a suit means nothing to a party unless he gets the relief”. [Reference to the links below].
————————————————————————————————————————————
‘HERE WE TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT’S THE LEGAL POINTS OF INTEREST’:

* The Constitution of the UAE and the ‘Arab Charter on Human Rights’ envisages many protective measures under the law. The Article 26, of the Constitution of the UAE it reads:

‘Personal liberty is guaranteed to all citizens. No person may be arrested, searched, detained or imprisoned except in accordance with the provisions of law. No person shall be subjected to torture or to degrading treatment’.

But what the UAE government practice is exactly the opposite of what they preach; making the UAE Constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery![Link: http://reparationlaw.com/caselaw/constitution-of-the-u-a-e/ ]

* The Arab Charter on Human Rights, adopted on 15 September 1994 by the League of Arab States, where the UAE is a party. [Link: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38540.html ]

*Wife of the late King of Saudi Arabia has won the right to sue his son, Saudi prince for breaching a contract [Link:“The Doctrine of State Immunity” ]

* “Decree Holders Entitled to Enjoy Fruits of the Decree Expeditiously” – Says Supreme Court of India! Link: ‘Supreme Court Judgment’

* “How does fraud affect a victim? ‘The impact of fraud on victims’ – Supreme Court of India [Link: ‘Supreme Court Judgment’ ]
————————————————————————————————————————————

21) DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF TORTURE – HOSPITALIZATION AFTER REACHING IN INDIA.

The Judgment Creditor was admitted in ‘Hinduja hospital’ Mumbai, by the very next day of his release from UAE Prison. There he was treated by different doctors at different specialties including psychiatrists. The Judgment Creditor had a greater degree of psychological stress and physical harm as a consequence of brutal methods used by the Abu Dhabi police under detention. He was advised Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments, Diabetic treatments etc., due to the Pancreas disorder symptoms.

22) PURSUIT OF LEGAL REMEDIES IN INDIA.

The Judgment Creditor fought for justice by invoking all legal flora, including the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India. The various legal proceedings, costly and time-consuming, are chronicled in [Links] Part A & Part B of the Annexures. They cover events commencing from filing the Writ Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 1996. The Supreme Court found merit in the case suggested that the Delhi High Court could be approached in the matter under Article 226.

The Delhi High Court by its judgment dated 20-11-1997, directed the Government of India to settle the issue within two months of the date of the judgment. [Link: In the High Court of Delhi, Appellate Civil Jurisdiction]

There was continuous and contumacious delay on the part of the Government of India. No order was passed as directed by the Delhi High Court. This necessitated the Judgment Creditor to approach the Delhi High Court again in 2003. There was an interim order on 28-1-2004 that the Government should intimate the Court of the steps taken to protect the rights of the Judgment Creditor.

The second Judgment of Delhi High Court was rendered on 19-9-2007. It recorded a letter of the Ministry of External Affairs dated 29-7-1998 reading:-

“We are taking up the matter with our Embassy in Abu Dhabi once again, requesting them to pursue the case at appropriate level”. [Link: Second Judgment of the Delhi High Court - 2007]

The Government of India, did not take any action on the order of Delhi High Court, as well as repeated representations and communications from the Judgment Creditor, despite the fact that the most cruel violation of Human Rights and deprivation of freedom or property of the Judgment Creditor had been repeatedly established by judicial verdicts in a foreign country.

23) FURTHER REPRESENTATIONS FOR DIPLOMATIC ACTION BASED ON VIENNA CONVENTIONS.

The International Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations, outlines the rules of law for safeguarding the interests of NATIONALS of the sending States and the treatment of envoys between states. Both the States, India and the UAE are parties to the present Conventions. The functions of Diplomatic Missions according to the Vienna Convention is listed below.
————————————————————————————————————————————
Article 5 & 36 of the ‘Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963’ specify the duties of consular officials’ when citizens of their country face difficulties in a foreign State.

Representation to Government of India: [Link: ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ Timeline Highlighting Submissions & Responses]

[Link: Article 5 & 36 of the ‘Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963’] – Done at Vienna, Austria on 24 April 1963. It consist, inter alia, in: (e) helping and assisting nationals, both individuals and bodies corporate, of the sending State.

And also under the Article (3)(b) in the ‘Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) – Done at Vienna on 18 April 1961′; the functions of a diplomatic mission under VCDR consist in: (b) Protecting in the receiving State the interests of the sending State and of its nationals, within the limits permitted by international law.

How Far Must We Protect Our Citizens Abroad? Edwin Montefiore Borchard (1884-1951)
————————————————————————————————————————————

24) INDIA HAD BREACHED ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS.

The government of India is in clear breach of its international obligations under the Article (5)(e) Consular Functions of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963’ – Done at Vienna, Austria on 24 April 1963.

The victim here a citizen of India who has been suffering all through ever since he was a victim of a violent extortion racket in Abu Dhabi police that targeted him. he was illegally arrested, brutally tortured, arbitrarily imprisoned and being held incommunicado and deported illegally from the UAE without any asset whatsoever to India.

The Dignity and Rights of the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was not restored by the Executive authority of Abu Dhabi, as directed by both the Courts, the Court of First Instance and the Supreme Court, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

The Government of India has not been able to get justice for the Judgment Creditor so far, except a cruel and deliberate betrayal over the past two decades”. Virtually, the Judgment Creditor was transferred from one cage to another, his freedom or dignity and his professional life continues to be denied indefinitely despite his running from pillar to post, to restore his dignity and respect and to recover his assets.

Further about the UN Articles on Diplomatic Protection, it has been codified by the existing customary International Law on the protection of NATIONALS abroad or whose Property Rights have been unlawfully violated abroad by a foreign government. [Link to the Article is given below].
————————————————————————————————————————————
The doctrine of ‘international responsibility’ [Link: The 'Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power' (Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/34 of 29 November 1985)

The Articles on Diplomatic Protection: In May 2006, the International Law Commission (ILC) has adopted the Articles on Diplomatic Protection, These articles largely codify existing customary international law on the protection of nationals abroad by means of diplomatic protection. [Link: Articles on Diplomatic Protection]

Indian expatriates are exposed to the extreme degree of Human Rights Violations in the Arab Gulf. [Link: India's National Shame!]
————————————————————————————————————————————

25) FURTHER FACETS OF VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

The brutal torture of the Judgment Creditor at the Abu Dhabi prisons have caused him irreparable and serious physical ailments. As a result, at his advanced age, he is suffering now great strain, physically and mentally. the Judgment Creditor’s two children and wife who are also subjected to great sufferings as a result of the unjust deprivation of his entire property and their sustenance and facilities of life. The unabated agonies of the Judgment Creditor continues for over two decades. the Judgment Creditor’s younger brother who suffered great physical pain and mental anguish has also taken its toll on his life.

26) THE UN WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION (UNWGAD).

In February 2016, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (UNWGAD) announced its decision finding that the detention of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is unlawful. The United Nations Working Group has ordered that the Swedish and British authorities to end Mr. Assange’s deprivation of liberty, respect his physical integrity and freedom of movement, and afford him the right to compensation.

The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (UNWGAD) had given inspiration to the suffering individuals in various parts of the world by its glorious Judgment in Assange’s case. A laudable principle was also declared. Various forms of deprivation of liberty “constitute a form of arbitrary detention”. [Link: The Judgment in Assange’s case]

An illustrative precedent of UN Working Group in meting out justice to a person whose Human Rights had been violated are grave criminal acts and serious violation of Human Rights justifying the intervention of the UN Working Group.

Assange lost in all legal proceedings including the appeal to the highest Court in United Kingdom. The UN Working Group, however, meted out justice to the deserving individuals, when fact established beyond doubts the violation of Human Rights.

27) CONCLUSION.

In the case of the Judgment Creditor, there has been integrated and connected activities on the part of the policemen and the officials of Abu Dhabi, UAE and the UAE Government itself in arresting without justifiable reasons; malicious and deliberate misuse of power, subjecting him to torture, violating the provisions of production of an accused in a Court of Law, prolonged arbitrary detention, disregarding the verdict of the judiciary on the innocence of the victim, and violating the basic principles of a civilized Government of honouring verdict of the judiciary, Executive abiding by such verdict.

The Legal Court of First Instance of Abu Dhabi was declared that the conduct of the policemen clearly proved the malicious motives in initiating a criminal complaint against the Judgment Creditor. However, an order of enquiry passed by the Legal Court [Link] against the conduct of the Policemen was ignored by the UAE authority. The conduct of the Prosecutor too was condemned.

The relevant portion of the Final Judgement [Link] of the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi, praising the qualities of the Judgment Creditor and condemning the malicious actions of his ‘debtors’ is reproduced here for ready reference:-

“All the pieces of evidence proved propriety in the acts and conduct of the Judgment Creditor. With regard to the facts of the case, the Supreme Court observed that the law had honoured the man who protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. A person dying while protecting that freedom is considered a martyr. And it was proved in this case that the policemen and other officials sought to arrest the ‘Judgment Creditor’ without any right and that they curtailed his freedom”.

The illegal deportation of the Judgment Creditor by the Executive of Abu Dhabi, UAE, on fraudulent grounds has multiplied the devastating effects on the victim, such as:-

His dignity and freedom remained lost arbitrarily as he was deported on a ‘fraudulent order’ [Link] issued by UAE Administration purposefully in order to avoid honouring its obligations. His entire assets and properties remained lost; as he was denied access to his three major business establishments [Link] and assets in Abu Dhabi, UAE, that caused ‘Multi-billion Dollars’ worth of damages;

His dignity, respect and all his assets remains lost even after two decades of passing the ‘Historic Judgments of the Highest Court of Abu Dhabi, due to non-enforcement of Judgments. The anguish resultant from the deprivation of his freedom, dignity and property, as such the huge business assets, earned only through his untiring personal efforts causes mental depression which will virtually make the life only a vegetable existence.

Thank You!

Panikkaveetil K. Jabir,

Founder-CEO, M/s. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell.

Link To Articles

• 1) ‘Judgment Creditor Booklet to Enforce UAE Judgments’
• 2) “Marking the 20th Anniversary of the Abu Dhabi Police-Looting”
• 3) Unique is the case of ‘Judgment Creditor’ – “The White Paper“
• 4) “The worst cheating scandal of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates”
• 5) Real-life ‘Judgment Fraud’ by the UAE Administration Uncovered!
• 6) Khobragade scandal sheds new light on India’s rotten diplomacy!
• 7) Truth and Justice are being nakedly sacrificed for “UAE Reputation”
• 8) The legacy of torture in the UAE; you may have never heard of!
• 9) India’s “National Shame”, the Ministry of External Affairs!
• 10) Representation for ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’
• 11) A Portfolio of UAE Judgments For Sale!
• 12) Reparation Law
• 13) Publications
• 14) Archives

VISIT ARCHIVES:-
Judgments and documents relating to ‘Judgment Creditor’

LET’S JOIN; TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO SUPPORT JUSTICE
“Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks”

ENDNOTES:-

CROWDFUNDING STRATEGY TO ENFORCE UAE JUDGMENTS

“Support the “Judgment Creditor” to strengthen the Integrity of the Judiciary and people’s confidence in our Justice System”.
“Invest In ‘Justice’ 1,000% Returns! – Read Brochure”

BUY JUDGMENT PORTFOLIO NOW:-

Funds are proposed to be raised by distribution of shares. “JFS – Funds Transfer“

FREE REFERRAL PARTNER PROGRAMME:-

How do I become a referral partner? “Referral Partner Program is Absolutely Free to Join“